Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Keith Coleman <keith AT cs.stanford.edu>]

The software itself isn't licensed under a CC contract; rather, it analyzes 
other works under CC contracts. Hence I am interested in all of the version 
2 licenses..


At 09:36 AM 5/24/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> I think CC encourages people to use other licenses
> when licensing software.
>
> If you're going to use CC-PD, then it probably doesn't
> matter too much, although the BSD license would work too.
> If you're going to use CC-SA, then I believe the GNU-GPL
> handles the nuances associated with software better,
> requiring source code and excluding software patents (iirc).
>
> If you're going to use a non-libre license
> (such as NonCommercial, EduOnly, NoDerivs)
> then a CC license is the only option since
> the Open Source Definition excludes such limitations.
>
> Keith Coleman said:
> > Is there a planned release date for the v2 licenses? I'm working on some
> > software that would benefit from info about the new versions,
>
> Greg London
> --
> "Impatient Perl" => Perl geek in about a week.
> http://www.greglondon.com/iperl/index.html
> Available in GNU-FDL, HTML, PDF, and paperback.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses