cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Sampling + BY-NC-SA-2.0 = ?
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:40:06 -0500
>>>>> "tp" == tom poe <tompoe AT amihost.com> writes:
tp> Hi, Keith: Would this not be a good example of why the
tp> CC-license is so desirable in the first instance, i.e., when a
tp> question on the use of another's work comes up, they can
tp> easily contact the owner to discuss terms that work for both
tp> parties?
Isn't that how "All Rights Reserved" works -- you have to contact me
and negotiate a deal before doing anything? What is it about the
Creative Commons licenses that makes it easier to contact the original
creator?
The advantage of having explicit licenses is exactly the _opposite_ of
this: you don't _have_ to contact me to negotiate terms. You have the
same terms as anyone else, and they're explicitly spelled out.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide
-
Sampling + BY-NC-SA-2.0 = ?,
Keith Coleman, 03/16/2004
-
Re: Sampling + BY-NC-SA-2.0 = ?,
tom poe, 03/16/2004
- Re: Sampling + BY-NC-SA-2.0 = ?, Evan Prodromou, 03/16/2004
- Re: Sampling + BY-NC-SA-2.0 = ?, email, 03/16/2004
- Re: Sampling + BY-NC-SA-2.0 = ?, Mike Linksvayer, 03/16/2004
-
Re: Sampling + BY-NC-SA-2.0 = ?,
tom poe, 03/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.