Development of Creative Commons licenses

[CC AT iblist.com]

For various reasons, adopting a completely open source policy is not what I 
and
the users want. 

Steven Jeffery

Quoting Wouter Vanden Hove <wouter.vanden.hove AT pandora.be>:

> cc AT iblist.com wrote:
> > I run a site that is a database of books and other printed media (see
> e-mail
> > address for domain).  I want to open the database for download through me
> only
> > under the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 license (I wish 2.0
> would
> > get out already).  What I want is for the website itself to be completely
> > restricted, but they can download the database through me under the above
> > license (I ddon't want them running a harvester bot or anything).  Does
> anyone
> > see any problems with using the above license on this kind of site?
> 
> It seems that your website is a collective project.
> So why don't you adopt a real open source strategy, like for example
> theassayer.org?
> 
> 
> Wouter Vanden Hove
> www.opencursus.org
> www.open-education.org
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>