Development of Creative Commons licenses

[email AT greglondon.com]

your draft 2 sharealike license is no different than
the CC-Public Domain license. If derived works can
have further restrictions added to it, then the original
work is effectively CC-PublicDomain.

Your original work would remain CC-PD, but I could create
a  derived work and license it All Rights Reserved.

Copyleft (Sharealike) only makes sense if the old license has to be
applied to the new work.

what 'camp' are you trying to satisfy?

I just released a perl programming manual 
(120 pages, several months of work)
under CC-BY-SA, and I would change the 
license if you changed the ShareAlike 
license to what you are proposing.
or force it to be version 1.0 only.

Greg

p.s. you can get the manual at
www.greglondon.com
just follow the links



On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 14:56:53 -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> I wonder if it would be possible to satisfy both camps by perhaps
> splitting the ShareAlike license stipulation into two. ShareAlike
> could be like 2.0 draft ShareAlike -- where you can add extra
> stipulations. ShareExact would be like 1.0 ShareAlike -- no extra
> stipulations, but new versions or iCommons with the same stipulations
> allowed.