cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Wouter Vanden Hove <wouter.vanden.hove AT pandora.be>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:29:28 +0100
Op zo 30-11-2003, om 09:08 schreef Evan Prodromou:
> This seems way off-topic for cc-licenses.
This is about people giving licenses to other parties without realising
it. Nobody reads EULA's, but at least everbody knows intuitively what
they mean.
If you think this is off-topic, please show me a more appropriate
copyright-thinktank that is willing to take these issues serious.
These issues came up advocating open licenses for course materials in an
MSN-group. They said "No, we want to reserve all rights."
Now I can rethorically answer "Then why are giving Microsoft all rights
to your courses?"
Pretty fun argument I thinks.
wouter
-
MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/29/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/29/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/29/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/30/2003
- Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft, Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Evan Prodromou, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/30/2003
- Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft, Evan Prodromou, 11/30/2003
- Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft, Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/29/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/29/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.