cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Brad Collins <brad AT studiojungle.net>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:00:28 +0700
Evan Prodromou <evan AT wikitravel.org> writes:
> This seems way off-topic for cc-licenses.
>
Then let's bring it in topic -- what kind of licence should we provide
for forums. Forums, like Wikis blurr the traditional concept of
publishing and copyright. Do any of the CC licences fit? If not, what
kind of licence needs to be created that does fit and what dangers are
associated with other licence models?
Networked forums are a form of correspondence, and collections of
correspondence are published for many purposes -- historical, legal,
lexical, literary or whatever. Preserving them is every bit as
important as traditional composed books. This is very much on-topic
for CC....
But you can always ignore the thread....
b/
--
Brad Collins
Chenla Labs
Bangkok, Thailand
-
MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/29/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/29/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/29/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/30/2003
- Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft, Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Evan Prodromou, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/30/2003
- Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft, Evan Prodromou, 11/30/2003
- Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft, Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/30/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Wouter Vanden Hove, 11/29/2003
-
Re: MSN-Groups & License to Microsoft,
Brad Collins, 11/29/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.