cc-fr AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Creative Commons France
List archive
- From: Antoine <antoine AT pitrou.net>
- To: cc-fr AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:56:42 +0200
Hi,
> The second clause prevents the use of DRM to protect the work: if
> licensor uses DRM, the license is not applicable to the work; if
> licensee uses DRM, license is automatically void.
The wording of an anti-DRM clause is a very delicate matter.
The clause in your license looks much too broad. For example, simply
setting up a password-protected Web site (which can be done for very
legitimate reasons: privacy, bandwidth limitation, etc.) could be
considered incompatible with your license.
This issue has also been raised concerning the anti-DRM clause in the
Creative Commons licenses.
See what debian-legal had to say about the Creative Commons anti-DRM
clause here:
http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
By the way, you may want to take a look at the Free Art License, which
is available in French, English as well as Italian:
http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/it/
Regards
Antoine.
-
[cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Antoine, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Max Brown, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Antoine, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Max Brown, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Antoine, 04/29/2006
- Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0, Max Brown, 04/30/2006
-
Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Antoine, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Max Brown, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Antoine, 04/29/2006
-
Re: [cc-fr] Against DRM 1.0,
Max Brown, 04/29/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.