Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-ca - Re: [Cc-ca] What if you don't want attribution?

cc-ca AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Creative Commons Canada

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Robin Millette <millette AT waglo.com>
  • To: cc-ca AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Cc-ca] What if you don't want attribution?
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:22:18 -0400

Heather Morrison wrote:
Please feel free to respond in french - I can read just fine, and am enjoying the conversation on this list very much, but my writing isn't that great, unfortunately...

Alors je vais répondre en français, bonjour du Québec ;)

What is a creator to do to indicate that attribution is not necessary? Usually, I do want attribution, but sometimes this is not necessary. For example, in our work at BC Electronic Library

from http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4216
Attribution comes standard

"Our web stats indicate that 97-98% of you choose Attribution, so we decided to drop Attribution as a choice from our license menu -- it's now standard. This reduces the number of licenses from eleven possible to six and makes the license selection user interface that much simpler. Important to remember: Attribution can always be disavowed upon licensor request, and pseudonymous and anonymous authorship are always options for a licensor, as before. If we see a huge uprising against the attribution-as-stock-feature, we'll certainly consider bringing it back as an option."

Autrement dit, il faut faire du cas par cas, et reléguer son droit de Paternité, BY, si l'utilisateur le demande, si on veut, bien entendu.

La Paternité vient souvent avec un URL source. On peut négliger d'en donner un par exemple, ou utiliser un pseudonyme.

Network, we do want attribution if you use one of the articles from our quarterly newsletter, ELN Connect. However, we also prepare generic press releases, and we want our libraries to feel very comfortable changing the wording and using as their own, for promotional purposes. This isn't quite the same as public domain, as this is for certain audiences only, and we still don't want commercial use.

Ici, il ne s'agit pas de Paternité mais de la clause « Pas de Modification », ou bien ND pour les intimes. Puisque tu mentionnes le domaine public, j'ouvre une parenthèse : la situation n'est pas très claire au Canada à savoir si on peut directement mettre une création dans le domaine public.

Dernière chose, « certain audiences » - tu veux parler des réutilisateurs du communiqué de presse ? Les licences CC ne permettent pas (sauf peut-être la licence pour les pays en développement) de discriminer selon l'audience, le goût ou l'utilisation par telle ou telle institution, par exemple les militaires.

J'espère t'avoir renseigné un peu, Heather.

--
Robin Millette, aka oqp http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/
Cogitateurs-Agitateurs, http://cogitateurs-agitateurs.org/
FACIL, pour l'appropriation collective de l'informatique libre
http://facil.qc.ca/





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page