cc-be AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Creative Commons - Belgium
List archive
Re: [Cc-be] Compatible CCPL licences? (was: Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.)
- From: Hannelore Dekeyser <hannelore.dekeyser AT law.kuleuven.ac.be>
- To: cc-be AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Cc-be] Compatible CCPL licences? (was: Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.)
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:46:20 +0100
Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Hannelore Dekeyser wrote:
[BE] Are the BE adaptation of the CCs licenses are all compatible with
the other respective adaptation ? Can I use a content licensed under
the CC-SA-1.0(en) in my work licensed work with a CC-SA-2.0(be-fr) ?
In the case of CC-NC, a author in US wants to use my work licensed
under a CC-NC-SA-2.0(be-nl) but the belgian translation removed the
lending rights ? How can I proceed with this issue without contacting
the author ? and by contacting the author ? Can you show us a
practical example ?
The licence says which licences are compatible for derivatives in
art. 4b)
I haven't see that. Can you make a copy of the respective part ?
thanks.
Art. 4 b:
You may distribute [...] a Derivative Work only under the terms of this
License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements
as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains
the same License Elements as this License (e.g.
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Japan). [...]
If you distribute the original work, you may not use another licence
(art. 4 a)
If you create a derivative you may use the current licence or any of the
following:
- a later version of the CCPL with the same licence elements
- any international CCPL with the same licence elements.
Hannelore
--
Hannelore Dekeyser
Interdisciplinary Centre for Law and Information Technology
Website: http://www.law.kuleuven.ac.be/icri
-
[Cc-be] Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.,
Alexandre Dulaunoy, 11/21/2004
- [Cc-be] DRM + ongewenste associatie, Stefaan Huysentruyt, 11/21/2004
-
Re: [Cc-be] Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.,
Hannelore Dekeyser, 11/23/2004
-
Re: [Cc-be] Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.,
Alexandre Dulaunoy, 11/27/2004
- Re: [Cc-be] Clarity of Licence elements? (was: Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.), Hannelore Dekeyser, 11/28/2004
- Re: [Cc-be] Compatible CCPL licences? (was: Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.), Hannelore Dekeyser, 11/28/2004
- Re: [Cc-be] Moral rights and DRM (was: Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.), Hannelore Dekeyser, 11/28/2004
- Re: [Cc-be] Copyright management information (was: Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.), Hannelore Dekeyser, 11/28/2004
- Re: [Cc-be] Copyright exceptions (was: Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.), Hannelore Dekeyser, 11/28/2004
-
Re: [Cc-be] Very quick comments on CCs-[BE] and playground for other discussions.,
Alexandre Dulaunoy, 11/27/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.