cc-au AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-au mailing list
List archive
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study
- From: Phillip Long <longpd AT uq.edu.au>
- To: "cc-au AT lists.ibiblio.org" <cc-au AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:39:33 +1000
Leigh - good questions. I'm actually wondering if the NC, ND constraints are as inhibiting as you're portraying them to be. I thought that NC meant that video couldn't be redistributed for commercial gain (as in appropriated by a 3rd party who then charged for access). If the video were instead put up on a commercial website that was freely available to anyone, as the YouTube distribution represents, then isn't the NC restriction still preserved? Wouldn't that still allow you to distributed it through your own unveristy website, for example? Why does it prevent you from putting it up on other commercial video sharing sites, as long as the access to it remains 'free' to the general public? The ND clause to me is understandable but not necessarily helpful. I can see Project Litto wanting to preserve the editorial integrity of the video the produced. Mashups, re-edits, clips etc., challenge they're initial storytelling intent. On the otherhand, that's exactly what I hoped this would foster - creative mashups that allowed this material to be leveraged, not with the intent of changing the message or in its most cyncial interpretation used to express an entirely different message from the original contributors intent, but with the idea of localising better in different contexts. The ND clause is indeed a heavy handed way of preventing that, and I have to agree, unncessarily restrictive. Regards, Phil Phillip Long, Prof. & Director University of Queensland, Australia
On 06/03/2011, at 8:11 PM, Leigh Blackall wrote: I'm interested why/how the video came to wear the license Non Commercial and No Derivatives? I saw no content within it that forced that... |
-
[ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Tama Leaver, 03/02/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Copyright, 03/02/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Tama Leaver, 03/02/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Jessica Coates, 03/06/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Leigh Blackall, 03/06/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Phillip Long, 03/07/2011
- Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study, Leigh Blackall, 03/07/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Tama Leaver, 03/07/2011
- Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study, Leigh Blackall, 03/07/2011
- Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study, Phillip Long, 03/08/2011
- Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study, Leigh Blackall, 03/08/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Phillip Long, 03/07/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Leigh Blackall, 03/06/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
elliott bledsoe, 03/10/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Phil Long, 03/10/2011
- Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study, Leigh Blackall, 03/10/2011
- Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study, James Neill, 03/10/2011
- Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study, Phil Long, 03/10/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Phil Long, 03/10/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Jessica Coates, 03/06/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Tama Leaver, 03/02/2011
-
Re: [ccAustralia] CC licenses in education- a case study,
Copyright, 03/02/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.