cc-au AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-au mailing list
List archive
- From: David <havefunbegood AT gmail.com>
- To: cc-au AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-au] cc-au Digest, Vol 22, Issue 3
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:08:20 +0800
I just read the ACC's paper on Creative Commons here:
http://www.copyright.org.au/g094.pdf
I'm a fan of Creative Commons, but not a one-eyed lunatic.
I also paid attention to the statement of the ACC's objectives at the end.
Did anyone find it to be something other than the subjective attack like I found the other article Brianna cited?
Both those papers on CC thoroughly contradict the ACC's objectives. I'm just wondering if I've got my head full of CC sand.
I would find it very hard to request my employer to cough up the lavish total$ to attend all of these sessions in addition to my time, given ACC HQ's path seems very crooked.
David.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:20 AM, <cc-au-request AT lists.ibiblio.org> wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:24:12 +1100
From: "Brianna Laugher" <brianna.laugher AT gmail.com>
Subject: [cc-au] Events: BarCampSydney, Aus Copyright Council
copyright training sessions
To: Wikimedia-au <wikimediaau-l AT lists.wikimedia.org>,
cc-au AT lists.ibiblio.org
Message-ID:
<d20d84ea0803092324l57df7836s34abac385160880b AT mail.gmail.com">d20d84ea0803092324l57df7836s34abac385160880b AT mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello folks,
Some events of interest:
I recall that the ACC is quite negative towards CC licenses (e.g.
<http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/articles_pdf/a06n04.htm>)
but I suppose these sessions would still be quite interesting and useful.
cheers,
Brianna
- Re: [cc-au] cc-au Digest, Vol 22, Issue 3, David, 03/11/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.