baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [BL] Slax review
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:49:45 +0000 (UTC)
Is Slax working well for you? Would you recommend
it to BL3 users who need something more capable?
Who is still using BL as their primary or only linux?
Sindi
Unfortunately the OCR program runs only
under Windows and forces me to keep a W98 copy on this computer.
Regards,
Christof
http://www.eecho.info/Echo/office/linux-ocr
Review of linux ocr programs.
CLI - gocr (jocr), ocrad, tesseract, ocropus
GUI - Clara, Ocre (GTK2), gtk-ocrad
Linux packages has ocrad 0.16 for SW11 (nothing older) which is 148K package and requires libgcc_s and libstdc++.so.6
gtk-ocrad has different deps - libX1 libXext libdl libm gtk1.2
The firefox dependencies should suffice.
gocr 0.37 (310K, SW9 or 9.1), 0.42 (SW11) - 300-400K or so
requires libpbm pgm ppm pnm from elflibs
See the review for diacritics ability.
These tested 94% correct, and tesseract (old) or ocropus (alpha) up to 99%.
Tesseract (HP commercial) is from 1995 made open source in 2005, about 3MB source code. Works on tiff not p?m.
Ocropus is sponsored by google and also does handwriting. Multilingual.
20MB source code.
I will on request try to compile for glibc 2.2.5 (either one).
How well does Win98 OCR do?
-
[BL] Slax review,
baslinux, 11/15/2009
-
Re: [BL] Slax review,
baslinux, 11/15/2009
- Re: [BL] Slax review, baslinux, 11/15/2009
- [BL] OCR, was Re: Slax review, baslinux, 11/15/2009
-
Re: [BL] Slax review,
baslinux, 11/15/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.