baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Baslinux mailing list
List archive
- From: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- To: baslinux AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [BL] wireless security
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:46:41 -0400
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 06:19:55AM +1200, Steven wrote:
>
> You're saying 128-bit WEP is not much better
> than no encryption at all?
>From what I understand, yes. Let me tell you why. Anyone sophisticated
>enough to intercept wireless packets is also
going to be sophisticated enough to know about programs that can easily crack
WEP keys after they've intercepted enough
packets. So, intercept=crack as far as WEP is concerned in my book. Thus my
statement that WEP is not much better than
no encryption at all. This applies to all -bits, as my research to date
indicates.
That said, I'd be happy to be proven wrong and/or to learn more about
wireless transmission and security. I don't
present myself as any kind of authority on this--as those who are familiar
with the nature of my posts to this list
over the years will doubtless realize. Shall I look up the WEP-cracking
programs and tell you what their developers and
users claim they can do?
James
-
[BL] wireless security,
baslinux, 06/27/2007
-
Re: [BL] wireless security,
baslinux, 06/27/2007
-
Re: [BL] wireless security,
baslinux, 06/27/2007
- Re: [BL] wireless security, baslinux, 06/27/2007
-
Re: [BL] wireless security,
baslinux, 06/27/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [BL] wireless security,
baslinux, 06/27/2007
-
Re: [BL] wireless security,
baslinux, 06/27/2007
- Re: [BL] wireless security, baslinux, 06/27/2007
- Re: [BL] wireless security, baslinux, 06/27/2007
-
Re: [BL] wireless security,
baslinux, 06/27/2007
-
Re: [BL] wireless security,
baslinux, 06/27/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.