Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Ezek 3:26

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Chris Watts <dekruidnootjes AT eircom.net>
  • To: Jerry Shepherd <jshepherd53 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ezek 3:26
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:31:39 +0100

<<<<< Hi Jerry, I will answer each question as you asked it below >>>>>>>

On 17 Jul 2013, at 18:04, Jerry Shepherd wrote:

Hi Chris,
Thanks for responding on this one. Just a few thoughts in reply.

(1) You say you have no training, but you have apparently had at least some
Hebrew. Could you tell us what you have had?

<<<<<<I have been reading for many many years and listening to music and anything that I could get my hands on; but only over the last couple of years have I actually been able to study in depth. No college education, just self taught, while truck driving around Europe, but now I have much more time to study... a lot of my learning came from Rabbinical sources in the sense that I learned how they pull things apart so to speak, now I recognise that some of their methods are questionable and am always questioning and keeping control, but I found more common sense and depth from them, more than I have the christian books and essays and preaching to be honest. Besids, They know their own language better than anyone and I value their insight a lot.>>>>>>>

(2) You said, “The root means as you know, to be clear, in the forefront,
shine, to demonstrate . . .”; but actually, I don’t know that. What
resource did you get this information from? Is this perhaps from an older
lexicon?

<<<<I could not afford those expensive lexicons and was happy to find a Samuel Prideax tregelles Lexicon based on Gesenius from 1864 for a few old pennies, I find it gives so much more information than the modern lexicons that I have seen on the web, even though they are undoubtedly up to date, I don't think up to date is always a good thing, nevertheless mine is also probably open to critical comments, besides I needed to purchase quite a lot of books some years ago and rummaged every antique bookshop I could find in Holland and England to get what I needed, it was more affordable, and I suppose a sense of nostalgia in thumbing through 150 year old pages wondering who was first reading them, it's funny seeing hand written notes from so long ago>>>>>>


(3) I appreciate the attempt, but you can’t really take a root word apart
and obtain meaning from just part of the root. So, it really isn’t
legitimate to read כח into יכח.

<<<<<this once again is something that I have looked a lot into, I keep my reigns tight and will not go overboard, I rely firstly on even shoshan and translate the modern hebrew, I then look up in dictionaries and see where else this word is used to get a feel for its semantics. But a valuable technique from the rabbinical method of analysis has in the past yielded incredible light on words and phrases that would not be so apparent merely by a sanitised grammatical perspective, (hastening to add that this does not replace anything, it is for me an added dimension that more often that not yields interesting depths) one has to be careful and I believe that I am, but I took hold of one particular technique where some verbs in hebrew have a consistent manner about them where you take the first two root letters and add a different third root letter and you often see a common denominator in its final application that would be linked back to the first two letters. Now I do respect grammatical frameworks and have many grammar books to help me, and I am aware that many on this forum will hot out at this and pooh pooh theis approach (I apologise to them), but I see Hebrew as being capable of telling us more than what the grammatical structure reveals, I think hebrew is playful and often the poetic narratives are filled with double and even triple possibilities that often provide tension between two extremes, even force us to keep two diametrically opposed ideas possible because sometimes that is the whole purpose, not to straitjacket a meaning by endless discussions on grammar but sometimes the meaningt is not meant to be fixed into concrete . And I saw in this verbal root strength, it stuck out a mile, and then applied this concept to someone who has a right mind based upon the actual root meaning which I got from Samuel Prideax tregelles Lexicon (1864) based on Gesenius. Now I realise that I took the last two root letters, it just stuck out too much to ignore. Strength of mind was what I kept feeling - highly Un-Empirical I know but that was my feeling. strength of mind, and the mind is the forefront and is the thing we use to demonstarte and should be lalight in the sunshine to make clear and right judgements and decisions, that is how I felt things when I read that verse.>>>>>>>

In any case, while I don’t think you get there by the right method, you are
nevertheless correct that the prophets were often thought to be not in
their right mind (see Jer 29:26; Hos 9:7).

<<<<<<I believe that the context fitted my translation, because God had said that he was to appear dumb (without speech) and that his manner was to appear of no worth in the face of the Israelites who knew him. I am reminded of how God refutes the wicked with foolish things and makes something that is 'not' into something that is 'something'. the faxct that God would open his mouth in pure clarity would, I feel, be strong persuasive evidence to his kinsmen that God was with Ezekiel.>>>>>>>

Chris Watts
Ireland


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Chris Watts <dekruidnootjes AT eircom.net>wrote:

As you know I have no training. So all I offer is an idea. After long
thinking I came up with a translation that I think fits both context and
makes sense from the hebrew. The root means as you know, to be clear, in
the forefront, shine, to demonstrate, allthe way to judge correct dispute
in the hiphil; I then took hold of the two letters כח which mean strength.
You need strength and clarity to perform all of the tasks that you
mentioned in your description. So my translation would be: "...you will
be silent and you will appear as one who is not in his right mind...." I
think a colloquial expression would have fitted the meaning, and looking at
it from the peoples' point of view who would see and know ezekiel this is
how God wanted him to appear for a short while (poor guy).

Chris Watts
Ireland




_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page