Biblical Hebrew Forum

[John Leake <jesleake AT yahoo.co.uk>]

I'm interested that 'eternity' is said to be the 'traditional' interpretation. That's the LXX's position, certainly (αἰῶνα), but the Vulgate (mundum) and Rashi (and I see the JPS translation) all go for 'world' which indeed gives much more satisfactory parallelism (את הכל עשה || את העלם נתן). Just a observation.

John Leake

----------------------------------

ان صاحب حياة هانئة لا يدونها انما يحياها

He who has a comfortable life doesn't write about it - he lives it

---------------------------------- 

On 1 Jun 2013, at 16:05, "Rev. Bryant J. Williams III" <bjwvmw AT com-pair.net> wrote:

Dear Jerry,

 

Considering the immediate context and the near context of the chapter I would think that changing the pointing would, although possible, but not probable. The consonantal text would go either way, but 'olam fits much better. The immediate context has not time represented by time, "zeman," in 3:1-8, then 'olam in 3:11, 14 in juxtaposition with creation represented by (asah, "made"). This gives more to the thought that "eternity" has a more metaphysical quality to the thought of "timelessness." This "timelessness" is something that man is not able to wrap the mind around as indicated by the latter part of the verse in which "man" is unable to "fathom," "understand," "comprehend," the works God has made. The use of 'olam in verse 14 corresponds to what is said in verse 11. In the end man is to "revere" God, i.e. to glorify and praise Him for who He is, The Creator.

 

Rev. Bryant J. Williams III

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew