b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- To: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:24:12 -0800
If a person apparently can’t tell the linguistic differences between the Hebrew used in Genesis and the Hebrew used in a modern Israeli newspaper, how trustworthily can we take his pronouncements concerning linguistics?
Karl W. Randolph.
Ps: since “I fully agree with you that "Reason works in math, not linguistics."” then why do you appeal to reason?
Pps: I see no use to continuing this discussion.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu> wrote:
Do you really have "recorded sources" as evidence to support your claim that: "King David would be hard pressed to understand a single sentence in spoken modern Hebrew."? Are these sources explicit about the king being possibly "hard pressed"?Isaac Fried, Boston UniversityOn Dec 17, 2012, at 9:40 PM, K Randolph wrote:Since when are recorded sources ‘fiction’?
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
K Randolph, 12/17/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
Isaac Fried, 12/17/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
K Randolph, 12/17/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
Isaac Fried, 12/18/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages, K Randolph, 12/19/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
Isaac Fried, 12/18/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
K Randolph, 12/17/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
Isaac Fried, 12/17/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.