b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- To: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:07:25 -0800
Isaac:
Reason is not evidence.
Reason works in math, not linguistics.
The evidence indicates that King David would be hard pressed to understand a single sentence in spoken modern Hebrew.
Karl W. Randolph.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu> wrote:
It totally stands to reason that king David spoke modern Hebrew (No WAYIQTOLs) to wives and children.Isaac Fried, Boston UniversityOn Dec 17, 2012, at 4:10 PM, K Randolph wrote:Isaac:Just because Biblical Hebrew is a different language than the modern Hebrew that you speak doesn’t mean that it was never spoken. Since you’re making the claim, where’s your evidence that it never was spoken?Karl W. Randolph.On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu> wrote:
We are still waiting for your evidence that biblical Hebrew was ever spoken.---IFOn Dec 17, 2012, at 3:26 PM, K Randolph wrote:to interview a native speaker during Biblical times, would we have found such an overwhelming use of Wayyiqtols in historical narrative
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
K Randolph, 12/17/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
Isaac Fried, 12/17/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
K Randolph, 12/17/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
Isaac Fried, 12/18/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages, K Randolph, 12/19/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
Isaac Fried, 12/18/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
K Randolph, 12/17/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Reason in languages,
Isaac Fried, 12/17/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.