b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
- To: Yigal.Levin AT biu.ac.il, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder"
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:21:12 -0500 (EST)
Prof. Yigal Levin: You wrote: “While I even agree with most of what you wrote, from past experience I know that the question at the end of your post is rhetorical. You obviously know something that nobody else knows. So spare us the sleepless night and please bestow a bit of wisdom upon us.” I am glad to oblige. But I am really hoping to learn from other people on the b-hebrew list as to their ideas. You and I both know that as soon as I set forth my own explanation of SLM in Jacob’s “ladder”, this thread will be promptly closed by the moderators. I don’t even get the benefit of receiving refutations of my views [which could be very valuable to me], because my threads are closed so quickly. But Yes, I think I may “know something that nobody else knows” about SLM and Jacob’s “ladder”, and I am more than glad to “bestow a bit of wisdom” as to this fascinating matter. But please consider allowing this thread to stay open long enough so I can get some refutations of, or other comments on, my controversial analysis of SLM. If the Patriarchal narratives are not an
exilic or post-exilic product, but rather [per my own view] were largely
composed in Years 13-14 [expressly referenced at Genesis 14: 4-5] way back in
the Late Bronze Age, then otherwise inexplicable hapax legomenon in this truly ancient
text may be common words that slipped over into Hebrew from Hurrian. That follows from the fact that
the Amarna Age was the only time period in Canaan’s long history when the ruling
class of As to SLM, in the phrase traditionally
translated as Jacob’s “ladder” at Genesis 28: 12, consider that $i-lum-i-ki is a Hurrian noun at Mitanni
Letter III 46 [Amarna Letter EA 24], whose meaning may be “having a view”. $ The Hurrian meaning here would not focus on
something being “high” or being a “ladder” or “staircase” or “stone steps on a
ziggurat” or “a Babylonian siege-ladder”, but rather would focus on “something
that allows (pleasant) relations to occur”. A loose one-word paraphrase of the
meaning of this Hurrian word $i-lum
might be “bridge” (used in a metaphorical, non-literal sense), or perhaps
better:
“gateway”. Now we see why I oppose any attempt to
translate $(R as “gateway”, when it actually has the more literal meaning in the
Patriarchal narratives of “gate”.
SLM means “gateway” [per $ilum
in Hurrian], and $(R means “gate”.
Jacob’s “ladder” is a “gateway”/SLM up to the “gate”/$(R of
heaven. Let me hurry to add that this beautiful,
priceless imagery at Genesis 28: 12 is all Hebrew, not Hurrian at all. The Hurrians are mainly known to
Biblical scholars as the people who thought of a-a-pi as being a tunnel to the
underground where the gods lived.
)WB [or the form )BT] is used in 16 different verses in the Bible. One mainstream scholarly view of this
mysterious Hebrew common word is that it is a loanword that reflects the Hurrian
and Hittite word a-a-pi, which is a
“sacrificial pit for summoning the underworld gods”. Sara E. Kimball, “Hittite Historical
Phonology” (1999), p. 65. See also
George C. Heider, “The Cult of Molek:
A Reassessment” (1985), p. 249, which deals with Leviticus 20: 6 in
particular: “Hittite/Hurrian a-a-pi (a pit connecting one with the
underworld)”. [That Hurrian word a-a-pi is also the likely basis for a
Hurrian interpretation of the name “Yapa-xu”, being the historical name from
Amarna Letter EA 298: 1 of the awful firstborn son whom I see as being the
“iniquitous Amorite” at Genesis 15: 16.] Thus the beautiful imagery of Jacob’s
“ladder” at Genesis 28: 12 is 100% Hebrew, and is virtually the opposite of the
Hurrian concept of “a pit connecting one with the underworld”. The Hurrian word a-a-pi never appears in the Patriarchal
narratives! Nor is this Hebrew
imagery dependent in any way on a Babylonian ziggurat. People are always mad at me for pointing
out Hurrian names and words in the Patriarchal narratives, but the reason I do
that is to assert that the Patriarchal narratives are much older, and much more
historically accurate, than university scholars realize. The Hebrews certainly did not borrow
their ideas from the Hurrian princelings who briefly dominated the ruling class
of In the Jacob’s “ladder” story, the early
Hebrew author of the Patriarchal narratives [who in my opinion was a true
genius] has taken a well-known Hurrian motif and literally turned it on its
head. Today we don’t think of
communicating with the divine the Hurrian way, by enticing gods to come up out
of the a-a-pi from the
netherworld. No, we think like
Jacob and look up, conceptualizing a “gateway”/SLM going up high to the
“gate”/$(R of heaven, the Hebrew way, per Genesis 28:
12. Jim Stinehart |
-
[b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder",
JimStinehart, 11/26/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder", Yigal Levin, 11/26/2012
-
[b-hebrew] The root סלם SLM,
Isaac Fried, 11/26/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] The root סלם SLM, Yigal Levin, 11/27/2012
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder",
JimStinehart, 11/26/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder", K Randolph, 11/27/2012
-
[b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder",
JimStinehart, 11/27/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder", Isaac Fried, 11/27/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder",
JimStinehart, 11/28/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder", K Randolph, 11/28/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] SLM: Jacob's "ladder", Isaac Fried, 11/28/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.