Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Portrait of Joseph in Chapter 40 of Genesis

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: jimstinehart AT aol.com
  • To: George.Athas AT moore.edu.au, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Portrait of Joseph in Chapter 40 of Genesis
  • Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:53:10 -0400 (EDT)


Prof. George Athas:

To my assertion that we should expect the Biblical text to give us a clue as
to what the Baker’s horrible crime was, you replied: “Nope. Why should it?
The biblical text says what it says, and that's just how it is. Such gaps are
common in storytelling. Your expectations may be different, but I fear they
have led you to look for things that simply aren't in the text. Maybe the
Baker's crime was that his mother taught him to handle his gun?”

A Baker would not be expected to be a military man, and so would not be
expected to use weapons. [I do not understand scholarly humor, so I will not
comment further on your odd remark about a gun.]

More importantly, though, you assert that I have unreasonable expectations as
to what the Biblical text should tell us, which allegedly “have led [me] to
look for things that simply aren't in the text.” That raises the key
question as to whether CLY XRY at Genesis 40: 16 indicates a treasonous dream
that contradicts Pharaoh’s new Year 12 anti-XRY policy. To address that key
issue, let’s compare straight up how it happened that such historical pharaoh
broke off relations with the XRY state of Naharim in Year 12, 7th month, with
what Jacob does 12.7 tenfold years after Abraham’s birth. The historical
material comes largely from Amarna Letters EA 27-29. The Biblical material
is in part at Genesis 31: 30-36.

1. Each of Pharaoh and Jacob had been forced to marry a woman from Naharim
against his will. [Historically, it was a diplomatic marriage that was
supposed to be for Pharaoh’s father, but he died. Biblically, Jacob wanted
to marry only statuesque Rachel, but could only do so by agreeing not to
annul the prior marriage to Leah into which he had been tricked.] Both the
Amarna Letters and Genesis 24: 10 refer to eastern Syria as “Naharim”.

2. The father of each of Pharaoh and Jacob had gotten along swimmingly with
his in-laws from Naharim.

3. The father-in-law from Naharim of each of Pharaoh and Jacob calls the
semi-monotheist “brother”. At Genesis 29: 15 Laban calls Jacob his
“brother”, even though they’re not literally brothers. In the Amarna
Letters, the king of the XRY state of Naharim calls Pharaoh “brother”,
meaning fellow king.

4. Although the semi-monotheist had many grievances against his
father-in-law from Naharim, the last straw in both cases was the same unique
event, which only happened once in 5,000 years of human history. In each
case, the irate father-in-law from Naharim imperiously demanded that certain
family statues be handed over to him by his semi-monotheistic son-in-law from
far to the west, but such statues were never handed over. [In Genesis,
that’s the teraphim. In the Amarna Letters, that’s the solid gold statues
that were supposed to become part of a family mausoleum in Naharim.]

* * *

Chapter 15 of Genesis is more of the same. (i) QYN-Y at Genesis 15: 19;
(ii) QNZ-Y at Genesis 15: 19; (iii) XT-Y at Genesis 15: 20; (iv) PRZ-Y at
Genesis 15: 20; (v) GRG$-Y at Genesis 15: 21; and (vi) YBWS-Y at Genesis
15: 21: those are six different non-west Semitic names for the XRY. Genesis
15: 18 says that Canaan is to be divinely reserved for the Hebrew
semi-monotheists, and that the XRY will in due course be displaced by the new
Hebrews.

* * *

We see that chapters 15, 27, 31 and 40 of Genesis, collectively, strongly
support Pharaoh’s controversial new policy as of Year 12 of breaking with the
XRY state of Naharim.

If chapter 40 of Genesis is referring to Year 13, and if XRY in the phrase
CLY XRY at Genesis 40: 16 has the same meaning as XRY at Genesis 14: 6, then
everything makes complete sense on all levels. Historically, everything
checks out. And, we would then know precisely what the treasonous nature was
of the Baker’s dream of three CLY XRY.

You write: “I fear..your expectations…have led you to look for things that
simply aren't in the text.” Yet look at what i-s in the text. Rebekah
reams out the XRY at Genesis 27: 46, per the following paraphrase: “I loathe
my life because of the XRY women. If Jacob marries a local XRY woman like
these [the XRY wives of Jacob’s older twin brother Esau], what good will life
be to me?” Jacob reams out his father-in-law Laban from the XRY heartland in
Naharim at Genesis 31: 36: “And Jacob was wroth, and chode with Laban….”
Both historically and Biblically, the last straw leading to the break between
the early semi-monotheist and his irate father-in-law from far-off Naharim
are family statues that are imperiously demanded but never turned over. YHWH
explicitly grants Canaan to the Hebrews, as opposed to the XRY, at Genesis
15: 18-21. Finally, the Baker is duly impaled three days after Joseph
divines the Baker’s dream of three CLY XRY at Genesis 40: 16.

If all these various stories in Genesis are looked at from the vantage point
of Year 13, then e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g makes sense, including the key phrase
CLY XRY at Genesis 40: 16. Then at long last I could join with you, and
heartily agree that as to chapter 40 of Genesis: “No mystery. No enigma.”
In my opinion, it’s simply a matter of doing an historical linguistic
analysis of the Hebrew phrase CLY XRY from a Year 13 perspective.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page