Biblical Hebrew Forum

[jimstinehart AT aol.com]

Prof. George Athas:
 
You wrote:  “The imagery of the birds pecking is enough to portend the 
baker's death. 
It's what birds did to corpses impaled in the open air. You just have to read 
the text. Plain and simple. No mystery. No enigma. No chicanery. Just a 
simple 
story. End of story.”
 
What could a Baker do to cause Pharaoh to have him impaled, with his corpse 
to be pecked at by birds?  You write:  “No mystery.  No enigma.”  But 
shouldn’t we expect the Biblical text to give us a clue as to what the 
Baker’s horrible crime was?  If we view XRY in CLY XRY at Genesis 40: 16 as 
having the same meaning as XRY at Genesis 14: 6, and if the Baker is being 
portrayed as having that dream in Year 13, then we can see that the Baker is 
guilty of treason, in contravening Pharaoh’s policy as of Year 12 of cutting 
off all relations with the XRY state of Naharim.  Joseph readily divines all 
of that from the Baker’s dream of CLY XRY.
 
As I noted in a prior post on this thread, Genesis 27: 46 could be 
paraphrased as follows [where XTY effectively = XRY]:  “Rebekah said to 
Isaac, ‘I loathe my life because of the XRY women.  If Jacob marries a local 
XRY woman like these [the XRY wives of Jacob’s older twin brother Esau], what 
good will life be to me?’”  Shouldn’t those harsh words of Rebekah be viewed 
as supporting Pharaoh’s controversial decision to cut off all relations with 
Egypt’s long-time ally, the XRY state of Naharim, and as agreeing that a 
dream of CLY XRY by a top officer of Pharaoh could potentially reflect 
actionable treason?  Don’t you see chapters 27 and 40 of Genesis, 
collectively, as in effect supporting that historical pharaoh’s controversial 
new anti-XRY policy?
 
All of this makes perfect sense on all levels, in particular on the 
historical level, if the implied time period in these cases is Year 13.  
Otherwise, I cannot agree with your assessment of chapter 40 of Genesis as 
being “No mystery.  No enigma.”  We should rightly expect the Biblical text 
to give us a good clue as to the nature of the Baker’s horrible crime.
 
In my opinion, the key to understanding chapter 40 of Genesis is to view XRY 
in CLY XRY at Genesis 40: 16 as having the same meaning as XRY at Genesis 14: 
6.
 
Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois