Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Ma- / Me- / Mi-

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Isaac Fried" <if AT math.bu.edu>
  • To: "Pere Porta" <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ma- / Me- / Mi-
  • Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:08:35 +0200

It is related, I think, to distinct developments of the usage of
MAH מה and MIY מי
Namely, MAMLAKAH = MA-MLAK-HA = MAH-MLAK-HIY.
In Hebrew letters: ממלכה = מה-מלך-היא
Recall, the all encompassing, fundamental statement of Hebrew grammar:

A Hebrew word consists of a root plus personal pronouns (identity markers).

Isaac Fried, Boston University

----- Original Message ----- From: "Pere Porta" <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 6:50 AM
Subject: [b-hebrew] Ma- / Me- / Mi-


Dear list,

in my struggle with Hebrew patterns I find a curious phenomenon or fact
with feminine nouns that consist of three root letters to which M- has been
preffixed (put before) and suffix -H has been added at their end.
And so,

-MAMLFKFH, kingdom (2Ch 9:19) -- מַמְלָכָה
-MEM$FLFH, rule, government (Mic 4:8) -- מֶמְשָׁלָה

-MILXFMFH, battle, war (Gn 14:2) -- מִלְחָמָה

I'm inquiring for the reason for this difference in the vowel of the
prefix: why A (patah) in the first, E (segol) in the second and I (hiriq)
in the third, the rest of the structure being exactly the same for all
three?
Is it a *custom* matter? Is there some good reason for this different
vowels? Does this different vowel imply some important differences in the
inner structure of the pattern and thus in the meaning of the resulting
word?

Kind regards from
--
Pere Porta
(Barcelona, Catalonia, Northeastern Spain)
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page