b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
- To: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:03:11 +0100
(Pere)
> Of course, Karl, sure that the Masoretes mistook this and this other word.
>
>> But... generally speaking the pi'el marks an intensive (as well as other
>> nuances) of the qal.
>>
>
> (Karl Randolph)
>
> Where do you get this idea of intensification? Is it not from
> mis-pointing of Qals as Piels?
>
>>
>>
> (Pere)
In most Hebrew grammars, Karl.
For a sample, in Gesenius Grammar:
"The fundamental idea of Pi'el to which all the various shades of meaning
in this conjugation may be referred, is *to busy oneself eagerly* with the
action indicated by the stem"
a) --a strengthening and repetition of the action:
צחק, *to laugh* (cf Gn 18:13) in qal and *to jest, to make sport* (cf Jdg
16:25) in the pi'el.
שאל, *to ask* (Jdg 5:25) in qal and* to beg* in the pi'el (Ps 109:10)
b) -a causative sense (like Hiph'il):
למד, *to learn* (Is 26:10) in the qal; *to teach* (Ecc 12:9) in the pi'el
Pere Porta
(Barcelona, Catalonia, Northeastern Spain)
> Let us take $ILAX in Ex 8:28. Can this be, does it make sense, the
>> usual "send"? No. It is "sending away", "expelling" what makes sense.
>> Paraoh did not send the people (to Canaan for holidays, for an example), he
>> expelled it from Egypt! (I'm writing here in the positive, but in Ex 8:28
>> the phrase is in the negative).
>>
>
> Yes it does make sense as a simple Qal. If it is pointed as a Piel, the
> points are wrong, which is not uncommon among the Masoretic points.
>
> Pharaoh had no intention of expelling Israel, in fact, Moses was merely
> trying to get permission to leave peacefully. The expelling came later,
> after the death of Pharaoh’s first born.
>
>>
>> In Pr 31:19 does it make sense that the woman send her distaff to, say, a
>> friend of hers? No, she "sent her hand with courage, decision..." onto the
>> distaff.
>>
>
> I’m sorry, but that makes no sense.
>
> A distaff is merely a piece of equipment used in spinning fibers into
> thread. There’s no courage or decision to take a simple tool, part of a
> typical woman’s daily domestic tasks. There’s no courage in handling what
> she probably touched almost every day. Decisiveness? Probably very casual.
> Unless the Piel is used as a stative, i.e. indication a habitual action,
> this is another example of a mis-pointed word.
>
>>
>> Heartly,
>>
>> Pere Porta
>>
>>
> Karl W. Randolph.
>
--
-
Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel,
K Randolph, 12/07/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel,
Pere Porta, 12/07/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel,
K Randolph, 12/19/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel,
Pere Porta, 12/20/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel, K Randolph, 12/21/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel,
Pere Porta, 12/20/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel,
K Randolph, 12/19/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] qal vs. piel,
Pere Porta, 12/07/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.