Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Pausal forms

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Vadim Cherny <vadimcherny AT gmail.com>
  • To: randallbuth AT gmail.com
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Pausal forms
  • Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:06:48 +0300

What we have in pausal forms are two separate issues:

1. Why there is elongation at all (or restoration to the original vowel, in your scenario)?
2. Why the epenthetic/ elongated (or restored) vowel varies?

You offered an explanation to the second point. I doubt it mainly because of historical improbability of such restoration and the lack of Secunda evidence. In your shame'u example, ayin was lost by the time of Masoretes, but could influence them choosing e over a.

My question, though, relates to the first point: whether the choice of vowel is etymological or phonetical, why there is elongation at all? And that, I venture, can be explained by uptalking (high rising terminal). From the anecdotal evidence, this speech defect is relatively common among Jews. Perhaps not incidentally, it surfaced in the US first in Los Angeles among middle class youngsters, where Jewish presence was high.

Tendency to uptalk liturgical text would be only natural, since cantors may feel shy when narrating the divine text. And uptalk is commonly blamed on speaker's insecurity.

If the Masoretes thought to counter the uptalk, they had to relatively reduce the final vowel. Since that would create schwa in many cases, they opted for indirect relative reduction, increasing the previous vowel instead.

Vadim Cherny

P.S. And sorry for mishandling email header in the previous message.

---

Randall Buth wrote:

> Well, there are lots of cases where the Masoretic vowels preserve stuff
from earlier stages of the languages. As for the Secunda, it is 'a'
witness, but not always the most reliable for the best preservation.
(for that matter, Greek had lost phonemic length by that time.)

As for your a+u = o hypothesis, you
left out the `ayin, so there is no expectation for reduction.
And note some pharyngeal sister-pausals:
laqaHu 'they took'
and nasa`u 'they travelled'.
Neither one has an etymological
'i/e' vowel, and both have the expected 'a' forms.
shame`u 'they heard', on the other hand, reflects its 'stative'
'i/e' etymology. Chalk one up for the Masoretes.
A hypothesis needs to cover wide data.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page