Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Range of OT TC Methodologies?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Philip <philipengmann AT yahoo.com>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew list <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Range of OT TC Methodologies?
  • Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:56:30 -0700 (PDT)

Dear Listees,

I don't seem to have received any responses at all to my query below?




________________________________
From: Philip <philipengmann AT yahoo.com>
To: Biblical Hebrew list <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Fri, July 1, 2011 1:06:36 AM
Subject: Range of OT TC Methodologies?


Dear Listees,

I am trying to do a PhD Thesis in OT (Old Testament) TC (Textual Criticism),
specifically on the differences between selected texts of the LXX & MT.

Ideally, I would like to have a range of methodologies, select one, and then
justify the selection of the methodology I have chosen.

Unfortunately, it appears to me that there are not many types of OT TC, since
the basic concept is to collate the LXX/MT differences and then to evaluate
them
using the 'canons' of OT TC as a guideline and the theory of Paul de Lagarde
as
a part of the theoretical framework.

I really would value your thoughts on the matter please.

Many thanks,

Philip Engmann,
PhD cand.
>From pporta7 AT gmail.com Tue Jul 12 01:57:40 2011
Return-Path: <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 20217)
id BBC67E8C98; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:57:40 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
mailman1.ibiblio.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VERIFIED, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
Received: from mail-yx0-f177.google.com (mail-yx0-f177.google.com
[209.85.213.177])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BA8E8C8A
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:57:39 -0400
(EDT)
Received: by yxj20 with SMTP id 20so2108583yxj.36
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:57:39 -0700
(PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.79.170 with SMTP id i30mr6157126yhe.4.1310450259003; Mon,
11 Jul 2011 22:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.109.16 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1310327790.42954.YahooMailRC AT web38502.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <1309478796.62495.YahooMailClassic AT web38507.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
<1310327790.42954.YahooMailRC AT web38502.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:57:38 +0200
Message-ID:
<CAN2C6qmzgBCtVDr-+P-xNV1XZg-RM5gya9Wv9Gjm79ygdEGYXA AT mail.gmail.com>
From: Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
To: Philip <philipengmann AT yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Cc: Biblical Hebrew list <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Range of OT TC Methodologies?
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:57:40 -0000

My dear friend Philip,

you face here a problem I myself faced sometimes: you put a question to the
list and... nobody gives an answer to it.
I'm quite aware of the annoyance this silence causes in you.
I often thought which can be the reasons for this lack of answering.
And I found this:

1. Maybe no listmember is interested in the issue in itself.
2. Maybe most members are away, on their holidays.
3. Maybe none knows the good answer to your question.
4. Moderators cannot, haven't the power to force members to give an answer.

Remark also that no rule of the List forces the individual members to give
an answer to a given question.

I myself feel that this list is centered on the Hebrew Bible and this is, to
my sense, the most important value and significance of this b-hebrew forum.
But at the same time, issues that move around the Hebrew Bible -and LXX is
one of them- are valueless for most of the members of the list.
Regarding the LXX, I think that some members -not all, because not all know
Greek- only refer to it for the sake of comparison, illustration and so on
of a given Hebrew word or sentence. But in a general way the members of this
list don't care of the LXX: they consider it as a subproduct of minor
value from the Hebrew text.

Now, to finish, I acknowledge and admit that Moderators should -generally
speaking- give an anwer similar to this of mine when a member --mainly if
he is a new one on the List- asks why nobody gave an answer to his
question.

Remark that b-hebrew is a forum of human beings, Philip, not one of
computers. And remember that this is a quite free forum -nobody is obliged
to put a question, nobody is obliged to give a replay to a given question-
with no dictatorial authority to force people to answer.

I'll be glad if only this is or becomes of some comfort for you.

As regards me, I do not feel myself ready to give an answer to your question
since I never undertook the task of doing some comparative studies about or
between the Hebrew Bible and the LXX. I know Hebrew and I know Greek, yes;
but I never sat down to do such a study.

This is what I think Philip. Quite honestly.

(As I'm a Spaniard and English is not my mother tongue, please excuse me if
some words in this mail are not fully appropriate)

Very hearty,

Pere Porta
(Barcelona, Catalonia, Northeastern Spain)


2011/7/10 Philip <philipengmann AT yahoo.com>

> Dear Listees,
>
> I don't seem to have received any responses at all to my query below?
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Philip <philipengmann AT yahoo.com>
> To: Biblical Hebrew list <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Fri, July 1, 2011 1:06:36 AM
> Subject: Range of OT TC Methodologies?
>
>
> Dear Listees,
>
> I am trying to do a PhD Thesis in OT (Old Testament) TC (Textual
> Criticism),
> specifically on the differences between selected texts of the LXX & MT.
>
> Ideally, I would like to have a range of methodologies, select one, and
> then
> justify the selection of the methodology I have chosen.
>
> Unfortunately, it appears to me that there are not many types of OT TC,
> since
> the basic concept is to collate the LXX/MT differences and then to evaluate
> them
> using the 'canons' of OT TC as a guideline and the theory of Paul de
> Lagarde as
> a part of the theoretical framework.
>
> I really would value your thoughts on the matter please.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Philip Engmann,
> PhD cand.
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>



--
Pere Porta




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page