b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Why not patah?
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:49:39 -0800 (PST)
It is unclear to me why you keep referring to modern Hebrew pronounciation,
when questions refer to a tradition of
reading which existed well over a thousand years ago.
As for hearing or not hearing a shwa na in modern Heb., may
I remind you of SHTUYOT BEMITZ? *
Cheers,
Uri Hurwitz
*stuff and nonsense
I think you should add the explanation that the claim of "proper"
pronunciation is a theoretical corollary of the dubious proposition
that a schwa following a qamats is a schwa "NA", which should
actually be "moved". I must say that I have never heard a-me-ru, sha-
le-xu, which also barely sound Hebrew to me.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why not patah?,
Pere Porta, 01/18/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why not patah?,
Yigal Levin, 01/18/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why not patah?, Pere Porta, 01/18/2011
-
Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why not patah?, Yigal Levin, 01/18/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why not patah? Why the ambiguity?, Christopher Kimball, 01/18/2011
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why not patah?,
Yigal Levin, 01/18/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why not patah?, Isaac Fried, 01/18/2011
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] Why not patah?,
Uri Hurwitz, 01/18/2011
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why not patah?, Isaac Fried, 01/18/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.