b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- To: fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] antonyms
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:43:02 -0800
Fred:
This logical fallacy I can name, “*Ignoratio elenchi*”.
Look it up in http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Ignoratio_elenchi
Karl W. Randolph.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:47 AM, fred burlingame <tensorpath AT gmail.com>wrote:
> the entire document serves as the proper context .... for any piece or part
> of the language in a single verse, including the proper antonyms, many & few
> (versus improper antonyms many & one).
>
> hence, 1 samuel 13:13-14; 16:1-15; invests 2 samuel 3:1 with
> implicit disapproval of saul and corresponding approval of david; saul
> weakened and david strengthened by wives and children.
>
> regards,
>
> fred burlingame
>
>
-
[b-hebrew] antonyms,
fred burlingame, 12/30/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] antonyms,
K Randolph, 12/30/2010
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] antonyms,
fred burlingame, 12/30/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] antonyms,
K Randolph, 12/30/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] antonyms, fred burlingame, 12/30/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] antonyms,
K Randolph, 12/30/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] antonyms,
fred burlingame, 12/30/2010
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] antonyms,
K Randolph, 12/30/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.