b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
[b-hebrew] Wasn't Codex L. pointed according to a preserved Jewish Oral Tradition?
- From: David P Donnelly <davedonnelly1 AT juno.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Wasn't Codex L. pointed according to a preserved Jewish Oral Tradition?
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 08:30:13 -0500
The title of this topic is:
Wasn't Codex L. pointed according to a preserved Jewish Oral Tradition?
I thought this subject was discussed a while back on B-hebrew,
and that it was sort of decided that when the first Masoretic texts were
created,
there was a PRESERVED JEWISH ORAL TRADITION
that clearly indicated how every single word of THE "UNPOINTED HEBREW
TEXT" was pronounced,
and that the Masoretes used that PRESERVED JEWISH ORAL TRADITION
to point the various Masoretic Texts that now exist.
Am I correct in this belief?
Dave Donnelly
P.S. It was also my understanding, that the PRESERVED JEWISH ORAL
TRADITION
was most definitely used to determine how the Jewish reader was to read
the six variants of YHWH
that occur in Codex L.
It is my opinion all the Jewish reader has to do to know how to render
YHWH in Codex L., is to observe the vowel point under the "Waw". If the
"Waw" in YHWH has a qamets under it, just render that variant of YHWH as
"Adonai" and if the "Waw" in YHWH has a hireq under it, just render that
variant of YHWH as "Elohim". This method seems to work 100% of the time.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
____________________________________________________________
Browse the web faster. Download Chrome
Browse the web as fast as you think. Give Google Chrome a try
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d19e6b17db9187fc02st04duc
>From leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il Tue Dec 28 08:47:42 2010
Return-Path: <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
id 28BEF4C06E; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 08:47:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (mtaout21.012.net.il [80.179.55.169])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D1D4C054
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 08:47:41 -0500
(EST)
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by
a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
<0LE5006004V3M400 AT a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:46:18 +0200 (IST)
Received: from leptop ([80.74.111.178]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il
(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
<0LE5006PR4X5CB20 AT a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:46:18 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:46:12 +0200
From: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
In-reply-to: <20101228.053106.956.311992 AT mailpop05.dca.untd.com>
X-012-Sender: leviny AT 012.net.il
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Message-id: <000001cba695$9705d1b0$c5117510$ AT biu.ac.il>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-language: he
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: Acumk7lVR7clZDBIQDyfHiHPeEMjbwAAWSBg
References: <20101228.053106.956.311992 AT mailpop05.dca.untd.com>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Wasn't Codex L. pointed according to a preserved
Jewish Oral Tradition?
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:47:42 -0000
Hi Dave,
In my personal opinion, this is almost correct, with the caveat that the
Masoretes may have "standardized" certain spellings, and with the
understanding that different communities may have had "received" traditions
on vocalization that were different from those of the Tiberian Mesoretes.
But this is almost impossible to actually prove.
Yigal Levin
-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of David P Donnelly
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:30 PM
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [b-hebrew] Wasn't Codex L. pointed according to a preserved Jewish
Oral Tradition?
The title of this topic is:
Wasn't Codex L. pointed according to a preserved Jewish Oral Tradition?
I thought this subject was discussed a while back on B-hebrew,
and that it was sort of decided that when the first Masoretic texts were
created,
there was a PRESERVED JEWISH ORAL TRADITION
that clearly indicated how every single word of THE "UNPOINTED HEBREW
TEXT" was pronounced,
and that the Masoretes used that PRESERVED JEWISH ORAL TRADITION
to point the various Masoretic Texts that now exist.
Am I correct in this belief?
Dave Donnelly
P.S. It was also my understanding, that the PRESERVED JEWISH ORAL
TRADITION
was most definitely used to determine how the Jewish reader was to read
the six variants of YHWH
that occur in Codex L.
It is my opinion all the Jewish reader has to do to know how to render
YHWH in Codex L., is to observe the vowel point under the "Waw". If the
"Waw" in YHWH has a qamets under it, just render that variant of YHWH as
"Adonai" and if the "Waw" in YHWH has a hireq under it, just render that
variant of YHWH as "Elohim". This method seems to work 100% of the time.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
____________________________________________________________
Browse the web faster. Download Chrome
Browse the web as fast as you think. Give Google Chrome a try
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d19e6b17db9187fc02st04duc
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
[b-hebrew] Wasn't Codex L. pointed according to a preserved Jewish Oral Tradition?,
David P Donnelly, 12/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] Wasn't Codex L. pointed according to a preserved Jewish Oral Tradition?, K Randolph, 12/28/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.