b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Kevin Riley <klriley AT alphalink.com.au>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:26:47 +1100
There is no evidence for the first half of your sentence, and it depends on how you understand the tower of Babel incident (God speeding up language change or creating new languages) as to whether the answer to the second half is yes or no. Again, we have no evidence on which to base an answer. So it comes down to a matter of faith, or of admitting our ignorance.
Kevin Riley
On 25/11/2010 8:10 AM, Doug Belot wrote:
If we accept that the language of Adam was Hebrew , would that not mean that all languages would have a base of hebrew
doug belot
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Kimball" <transcriber AT tanach.us>
To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 3:11 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet
Is Greek usually considered a cognate language of Hebrew?
Chris Kimball
West Redding, CT
USA
-
Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, George Athas, 11/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, fred putnam, 11/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, fred burlingame, 11/28/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, Isaac Fried, 11/27/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, Isaac Fried, 11/25/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, Arnaud Fournet, 11/25/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, Isaac Fried, 11/25/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, Arnaud Fournet, 11/25/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, Isaac Fried, 11/25/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, Kevin Riley, 11/24/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, fred burlingame, 11/24/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet, fred putnam, 11/24/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.