Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Goshen

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Goshen
  • Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:13:00 EDT


We can use linguistics, regarding the language used to describe Joseph’s
movements in Egypt, to help confirm that Biblical “Goshen” in the Patriarchal
narratives may be Egyptian nome 14: Qis/Kis, in central Egypt. We know
from Genesis 45: 10 that Joseph lives near, but not in, the land of Goshen,
so
Goshen may logically adjoin the capital of Egypt. But Joseph, who is in
charge of grain distribution at all of Egypt’s cities [see e.g. Genesis 41:
48], must be south of Goshen/Qis when his kin arrive in Goshen/Qis, or else
Joseph would have met his kin before they arrived in Goshen/Qis. Pharaoh for
his part would almost certainly be at a city on the Nile River. And if this
is the Amarna Age, we know that Pharaoh Akhenaten never left Amarna. Both
Qis and Amarna are in nome 14 in central Egypt. Because of a bend in the
Nile River at that point, the city of Amarna, on the east bank of the Nile
River, was north of Qis, which was on the west bank of the Nile River, south
of
Amarna. [From ancient times until today, the logical route to take in
walking south in Egypt was along the west bank of the Nile River, bypassing
the
city of Amarna. Jacob would not have walked through the city of Amarna in
any event, so Jacob has not yet had occasion to meet Pharaoh. Judah has
informed Joseph, and hence Pharaoh’s officials generally, in advance as to
the
family’s movements in Egypt, per Genesis 46: 28. Joseph knows, per Judah,
that his kin will arrive in Qis soon, but Joseph has been attending to
business south of Qis. Jacob is just south of Amarna, having just arrived at
Qis,
when Joseph comes up from the south to greet the family.]

As Professor Yigal Levin recently pointed out, correctly, on another
thread, when the Hebrews were south or southwest of Canaan, the Bible uses
the
phrase “go up”/(LH to mean “to go toward beloved Canaan”. In most parts of
Egypt, that would mean to go north or northeast, though in the northern
Delta, it would mean to go east.

We see (LH at both Genesis 47: 29 and Genesis 47: 31. Because Joseph has
not seen Jacob yet, we know that Joseph is south of the land of Goshen at the
beginning of this sequence. So we can be quite sure Joseph “goes up”/(LH
north at Genesis 47: 29 to see Jacob and Jacob’s family at Goshen/Qis. Then
Joseph, speaking Hebrew to his newly-arrived Hebrew kin, uses this same
word (LH and says that he will “go up”/(LH to report to Pharaoh. That must
mean that Joseph is going farther north, in the general direction of Canaan,
which works perfectly as Joseph “going up”/(LH farther north from Qis to see
Pharaoh Akhenaten at Amarna. Amarna is north by northeast of Goshen/Qis,
across the Nile River.

By stark contrast, if Biblical Goshen were an unattested place in the
eastern Delta (the traditional and scholarly view), then Joseph would go west
or
southwest, and would not “go up”/(LH north or northeast, to go to see
Pharaoh on the Nile River.

Some scholars have tried to get around this by claiming that (LH has the
opposite meaning at Genesis 47: 31. “Egyptians refer to going south as ‘
going up the Nile’.” Bruce Waltke, “Genesis” (2001), at p. 588, citing S.
Shibayama, “Notes on Yarad and (Alah: Hints on Translating”, JBR 34 (1966):
358-62. But Joseph is talking in Hebrew to his Hebrew kin who have just
arrived from Canaan. Certainly Joseph would use the word (LH the way the
Hebrews did, meaning to a Hebrew who was in Egypt “to go toward beloved
Canaan”.
Moreover, if (LH means “to go south” at Genesis 47: 29, 31, then the story
makes no sense, because Joseph cannot be north of the Hebrews, or else he
would have already met his father. Joseph must be south of the Hebrews, and
he must be traveling north, in the general direction of Canaan, when he “
goes up”/(LH to meet his kin, and then on farther north to see Pharaoh. Note
that the scholarly view of the identity of Biblical Goshen relies on giving
the Hebrew common word (LH the opposite meaning it normally has in this
context, a meaning that the context will not bear.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page