Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] "Yahweh" occurs 6823 times in the Roman Catholic NewJerusalem Bible BUT occurs "ZERO" times in the underlying Hebrew.

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Arnaud Fournet" <fournet.arnaud AT wanadoo.fr>
  • To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>, <davedonnelly1 AT juno.com>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] "Yahweh" occurs 6823 times in the Roman Catholic NewJerusalem Bible BUT occurs "ZERO" times in the underlying Hebrew.
  • Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:31:32 +0200


----- Original Message ----- From: <davedonnelly1 AT juno.com>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 2:52 PM
Subject: [b-hebrew] "Yahweh" occurs 6823 times in the Roman Catholic NewJerusalem Bible BUT occurs "ZERO" times in the underlying Hebrew.



The title of this topic is:

"Yahweh" occurs 6823 times in the Roman Catholic New Jerusalem Bible
BUT occurs "ZERO" times in the underlying Hebrew.

[...]

OR IS IT POSSIBLE THAT SOME EDITION OF A MASORETIC TEXT IS HIDDEN AWAY
SOMEWHERE AND "YAHWEH" OCCURS "6823'" TIMES IN THIS HIDDEN AWAY
MASORETIC TEXT?

Dave Donnelly

P.S. Why does this issue appear to be ignored on B-Hebrew?

It doesn't seem possible that the writings of the Early Greek Fathers can
legitimately over rule the Hebrew Scriptures on this particular issue.
***

Any idea why it is 6823 times, no less no more?


When compared to the distance Earth-Moon, the total length of the Chinese Wall, the Great Pyramid's square root of whatever plus or minus some skull measurements...

Any concrete suggestions?

Maybe you have a preference for logarithmic scale?
There's a little touch of mathematical understanding in logarithmic scale, don't you think? [spoiled by .xls graph menu, actually, a cause of concern to some extent]

Maybe it has some *relevant* [sic] relationship with the height of Notre Dame in centimeters according to page xx,yyzz of The Big Conspiracy Made Easy (to be published soon).


I noticed the number cannot be divided by 2, 3 or 5, or 23. Strange no? This must mean something, preferably bad I suppose. Help, somebody!


Many thanks.

Arnaud Fournet






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page