Biblical Hebrew Forum

[davedonnelly1 <davedonnelly1 AT juno.com>]

At the following link: http://truthintheword.com/names.htm
under the heading:
H. Gesenius' translate #3068 as follows:

Gesenius clearly explains in his third sentence 
that Hebrew Word #3068 and "Adonai" DO NOT HAVE THE SAME VOWEL POINTS. 

To be redundant,
The Hebrew Scholar Gesenius analyzes Hebrew Word # 3068,
and clearly notes 
that the first vowel point of Hebrew Word 3068 and the first vowel point
of Adonai are different.

Since Hebrew Word #3068 is definitely not a perfect example of Qere
Perpetuum,
what is the actual reason that the Jewish reader reads "Adonai" 
when he or she sees Hebrew Word #3068 in the Hebrew Bible? 

Dave Donnelly
____________________________________________________________
Diet Help
Cheap Diet Help Tips. Click here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/c?cp=AQkV3ipdA98pSWAXMdv3jgAAJ1BVGyITH_OGb159rldJgo3SAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYQAAAAAA=
>From kwrandolph AT gmail.com  Thu Feb 18 09:55:52 2010
Return-Path: <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
        id 8637D4C014; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:55:52 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
        autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3
Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com (mail-yx0-f174.google.com
        [209.85.210.174])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CB24C013
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:55:51 -0500 
(EST)
Received: by yxe4 with SMTP id 4so7448994yxe.31
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:55:51 -0800 
(PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.65.3 with SMTP id n3mr7457001yba.322.1266504951715; Thu, 
        18 Feb 2010 06:55:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4f3a6171002180121y3fe353eyc268ec09dd50aeff AT mail.gmail.com>
References: <4f3a6171002160240r19595458x44cfcd8a635eefc4 AT mail.gmail.com>
        <acd782171002160829l5e1de00ekd66ac0f7f305d71b AT mail.gmail.com>
        <4f3a6171002170457p22889cf7tedbdccda1b033774 AT mail.gmail.com>
        <acd782171002170708x455c605cg6bbec2bb242fbdf0 AT mail.gmail.com>
        <4f3a6171002171059l4aa09e24p55a619f5653788dc AT mail.gmail.com>
        <acd782171002171330o6fc081e4g6e208714ac7fa528 AT mail.gmail.com>
        <4f3a6171002180121y3fe353eyc268ec09dd50aeff AT mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:55:51 -0800
Message-ID: <acd782171002180655n6cc31f98we2ca4bd9d93d5834 AT mail.gmail.com>
From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Nation of Israel (quick conquest or not)
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:55:52 -0000

James:

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:21 AM, James Christian
<jc.bhebrew AT googlemail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>> The Egyptian dating is messed up, as even people who do not believe the
>> Bible but look at archeology claim. So the question then becomes, when
>> were
>> they written? Around 1400 BC is off the table, not believable. I don=E2=
=80=99t
>> know
>> the answer yet.
>>
>>
> Sure. The only thing we can say for sure (assuming no forgery conspiracy
> theories) is that they were written in the time of the 18th dynasty to
> Pharaohs like Amenhotep. What time exactly he was around we can't say for
> sure but if Shishak is Shoshenq then we have a list of pretty much confir=
med
> Pharaohs who all must have ruled for at least some time so we do have som=
e
> kind of framework we can build on.
>
> James Christian
>

We don=E2=80=99t even know that Shoshenq =3D Shishaq, or was it Shoshenq =
=3D King So =D7=A1=D7=95=D7=90
mentioned in 2 Kings  17:4? Was Shishaq the same as Raamses II or Thutmosis
II? With the problem that the Egyptian kings had numerous names, not
counting nicknames and often poor transliterations into other languages, we
don=E2=80=99t know the answers to these questions.

Karl W. Randolph.