Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Transliterating from Hebrew to Greek

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "James Spinti" <JSpinti AT Eisenbrauns.com>
  • To: "Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Transliterating from Hebrew to Greek
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:23:54 -0500

Randall knows what he is talking about. The papyri, inscriptions, and
DSS all bear out what he is saying--in addition to the evidence from
transliteration into Latin of Greek words.

James

________________________________
James Spinti
Marketing Director, Book Sales Division
Eisenbrauns, Good books for more than 30 years
Specializing in Ancient Near Eastern and Biblical Studies
jspinti at eisenbrauns dot com
Web: http://www.eisenbrauns.com
Phone: 574-269-2011 ext 226
Fax: 574-269-6788

-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Randall Buth
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 1:18 PM
To: Hebrew
Subject: [b-hebrew] Transliterating from Hebrew to Greek

>All we can really say with certainty is that:
. . .

I didn't repeat your summation because the general picture is
probably clearer than you were portraying.


>> And here one must ask which value of HTA was intended, an [i] or [e],
and
>>always remembering to ask according to which manuscripts?
>> Apparently, HTA went to [i] around the 2nd century CE, maybe a little
>> later.
>> Fortunately, because this was about 4-5 centuries later than EI went
to I,
>> the spelling traditions with HTA are relatively stable, especially in
the
>> centuries 2-5 CE, when the historical spellings were usually
preserved.
>
>I'm not sure you can say most of what you just said in the last
paragraph
>with any degree of certainty. >

There is more surety than you may be aware of.
All reconstructions are within bands of probability, but that being
said,
Greek phonologists wouldn't have a problem with my paragraph. See
Horrocks, Gignac, Bubenik, Teodorrson, even Buth.

EI went to an I sound [pronounced 'ee' in 'feet'] from as early as the
4th century
(Teodorrson) and especially in the 3rd and 2nd c BCE. You can give this
trend a 99% rating.
HTA may have started drifting in the first century CE but only appears
to be
generally absorbed into I in the 2-3 c CE. Inscriptions and papyri, even
Dead Sea Greek all make this pretty clear. Roman catacombs too. the
whole Mediterranean. You can give this a 90 rating. But one must sift
the
data as a phonologist and cognizant of how sound systems change
emically.
Then the broad strokes are pretty easy.

--
Randall Buth, PhD
www.biblicalulpan.org
randallbuth AT gmail.com
Biblical Language Center
Learn Easily - Progress Further - Remember for Life
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page