Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Transliterating from Hebrew to Greek

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Transliterating from Hebrew to Greek
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:08:34 +0100

Dear James,

A very good source that illuminates the correspondence and lack of correspondence between Hebrew and Greek letters is: E. Brönno. "Studien über hebräische Morphologie und Vocalismus". Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes xxvii, 1943. This is a study of the Mercati manuscript of Origen's Hexapla.


Best regards,

Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo




Hi all,

recent discussions have led me to take a closer look at transliteration
patterns from Hebrew to Greek. I share my preliminary observations below:

From Genesis 2:8 we see Eden in MT as ÚՓ‘Ô however, in Greek we see EɬɈÉ
(edem) thus highlighting two features.

1) Ayin has no correspondent in the Greek and so it moves straight on to the
following vowel.
2) A confusion between the similarly pronounced phones of n and m.

In Genesis 2:11 we see the river Pishon in MT as Ù¦È÷ÂðÔ while in Greek É"É«É-É÷ÉÀ
thus highlighting other interesting features:

1) A confusion between aspirate p and unaspirated p (Greek uses phi).
2) We see Greek omega (long o) stading in the place of holem waw as we would
ordinarily expect

In Genesis 2:13 we see the river Gishon in MT as ’¦ÈÁÂðÔ while in Greek we
see ɡɉÉ÷ÉÀ thus highlighting more interesting features:

1) Despite Greek having a letter chi kh sound is completely omitted. We only
see its trace in the middle of an unusual combination of Greek vowels ɉÉ÷
2) Long /i:/ vowel transliterated with ɉ
3) Again Greek omega stands for holem waw as we would expect (we haven't
gone far into the Torah but we are already starting to notice a consistent
pattern here)

We see in MT ýÀ“ÀÌ but in LXX we see AɬÉøÉ again highlighting an already seen
feature:

1) Impossible to represent consonant aleph is dropped from transliteration
and its following vowel is the first letter we see (i.e. alpha)

In general, we see that problem consonants are omitted and their nearest
vowels are used instead. This pattern is considerably evident and well
testified for the Hebrew holem waw combination which is consistently
transliterated with Greek Omega (if there are counter examples I would be
delighted to see them).

James Christian
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page