b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Karyn Traphagen <karyn AT birchbarkstudio.com>
- To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Why dagesh in nun of this form
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:53:01 -0400
On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Randall Buth wrote:
Hebrew developed two Hif`il verbs using the root n.v.H.
Yes, but can we say how they developed? We see the A and B entries (in BDB) for n.w.H. but we want to know why one has the different pointing. Does this point (no pun intended) to a divergence from a single root or is it possibly a merger of two roots that did not extend to the hiphil? Or is the dagesh simply to distinguish between the two meanings of the root. If so, do we have another example?
In other words, how do we account for the short vowel and dagesh? All other similar verbs (hiphil, imperative, mp of middle weak verbs) have the long vowel and no dagesh.
Karyn
Karyn Traphagen
Doctoral Student
Stellenbosch University
-
[b-hebrew] Why dagesh in nun of this form,
Karyn Traphagen, 06/26/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] Why dagesh in nun of this form,
Randall Buth, 06/26/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why dagesh in nun of this form,
Karyn Traphagen, 06/26/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why dagesh in nun of this form, K Randolph, 06/26/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why dagesh in nun of this form,
Karyn Traphagen, 06/26/2009
-
[b-hebrew] Why dagesh in nun of this form,
Randall Buth, 06/27/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why dagesh in nun of this form, K Randolph, 06/27/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.