Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] The Role of Hebron: Jacob/"Israel"

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] The Role of Hebron: Jacob/"Israel"
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:40:13 EST


Hebron as Jacob’s Place of Planned Retirement and Burial

After Jacob finishes his 14-year obligation to work for Laban at Harran,
Jacob shows remarkably little inclination to go back to Canaan, much less to
move
to modest Hebron. Jacob’s beloved mother Rebekah has already died, and Jacob
is semi-estranged from his father Isaac (who is living in retirement in
Hebron). Jacob blames his father Isaac for always having heavily favored
Jacob’s
older twin brother, Esau. Jacob does not leave Harran until conditions at
Harran become intolerable for Jacob. Then instead of going to Hebron, Jacob
chooses to sojourn for several years at Shechem, in central Canaan.

Unlike Abraham, Jacob’s most profound religious experiences are not in
southern Canaan (at Bethel/Ai, north of Jerusalem, and at Hebron), but rather
are in
northern Canaan, at Lus (or Luz or Lusi, alternatively called Laish or
Lechem, and later called Dan), at the foot of Mt. Lebanon. Jacob himself
decides to
call Lus/Luz by the name of “Bethel”, meaning “house of God”, because Jacob
has the Jacob’s Ladder religious experience there. “And he called the name
of that place Beth-el, but the name of the city was Luz at the first.”
Genesis 28: 19 When Jacob fears for his life after the Decapitation of the
Shechem
Offensive in chapters 34 and 35 of Genesis, Jacob returns up north to Luz/Lus
(referred to by Jacob as “Bethel”, but having nothing to do geographically
with Abraham’s Bethel/Ai). Jacob buries his favorite wife, Rachel, at
Bethlehem
of Galilee/Bethlehem Sur (not at Bethlehem of Judea south of Jerusalem), and
then sojourns at historical Eyn-dor, a fortified town referred to in chapter
35 of Genesis as migdal Eder/E – d-r (where E is an ayin, and Eyn is the
formal
spelling of ayin, and “migdal” means “the fortified town of”).

Only when Jacob is age 50 regular years, and has become a fairly old man,
does Jacob finally decide to retire at Hebron, now that his 80-year-old
father
Isaac has become infirm. In fact, prior to age 50, Patriarch #3
Jacob/“Israel”
had never lived at Hebron.

As we know, Jacob’s planned retirement at Hebron is later rudely interrupted
by a terrible famine in southern Canaan. Patriarch #3 Jacob/“Israel” lives
in Hebron for a mere 15 regular years, as an old man, and Jacob never does
anything noteworthy in Hebron (except when he eventually decides that all the
Hebrews should leave Hebron to go to Egypt because of a terrible famine).
Note
that Hebron in southern Canaan is closely associated with a terrible famine
in
all three generations of the Patriarchs. Jacob is forced to lead all the
Hebrews into Egypt when famine engulfs Hebron, though like his father and
grandfather before him, Jacob insists upon being buried back in Hebron.

Conclusion: Hebron Is a Place of Retirement and Burial for the Patriarchs

The Patriarchal narratives present a sober, realistic view of modest Hebron
in southern Canaan, rather than portraying Hebron as being nirvana. No
Patriarch ever makes any money at Hebron, and reading between the lines, each
Patriarch exhausts his formerly vast funds in retirement at modest Hebron.
Note that
formerly wealthy Jacob does not seem to have any substantial wealth when
Jacob leads the Hebrews from Hebron into Egypt. Yes, the Hebrews have
belongings
which they carry in wagons to Egypt, but it seems that the Hebrews are
basically reduced to living off of vizier Joseph’s generosity in Egypt, as
Joseph
gives grain to the Hebrews during Joseph’s entire life. Jacob’s older sons
appear to worry that they might basically starve in Egypt after their
father’s
death, unless vizier Joseph continues to give them food to eat and provides
for
them generally. Thus Joseph needs to reassure his older half-brothers as
follows: “‘Now therefore fear ye not; I will sustain you, and your little
ones.'”
Genesis 50: 21

Each Patriarch retires in Hebron (though Jacob is later forced to leave
Hebron), and each Patriarch insists on being buried in Hebron. But once
Sarah
fails to get pregnant in Hebron, no Patriarch thereafter spends any of his
active
years at Hebron. No, Hebron is thereafter viewed by the Patriarchs as
suitable only for retirement and burial.

Based on the foregoing, we can conclude that the Patriarchal narratives were
not composed by one southern Hebrew, Ezra, or by four southern Hebrews, J, E,
P and D. Rather, the Patriarchal narratives were composed by a single
northern Hebrew (who spent several years working in Egypt). The unique
northern
Hebrew point of view shines through on every page of the text of the
Patriarchal
narratives, if we will just look for it. The northern pre-Hebrews thought
that
they might have to move to modest southern Canaan in order to avoid a feared
onslaught from the dreaded Hittites, who operated immediately north of
northern Canaan. (People in southern Canaan, by stark contrast, paid no
attention
whatsoever to the Hittites, even as people in northern Canaan talked of
little
else, as we know from the Amarna Letters.) But though Hebron might possibly
be
a safe place for the northern Hebrews, there was no money at Hebron (unlike
relatively wealthy, but dangerous, northern Canaan). There simply was no
excitement for a northern Hebrew at Hebron. Beginning with Isaac’s birth,
even all
of the Patriarchs’ profound religious experiences occur at places other than
Hebron. If we will look at the matter objectively, it becomes clear that
Hebron is viewed in the text as being a suitable place for a Patriarch’s
retirement and burial, not much else.

Jerusalem, which is so central to the thinking of all the southern Hebrews,
is never mentioned once in the entirety of the Patriarchal narratives. Who
are
we kidding here? The Documentary Hypothesis, which posits four southern
Hebrew authors of the Patriarchal narratives (J, E, P and D), cannot possibly
be
right, because the Patriarchal narratives are told from a northern Hebrew
perspective. As we have seen on this thread, Hebron is viewed as being a
modest
place, fit for a Patriarch’s retirement and burial, but not much more than
that.
Only a northern Hebrew would have such an unflattering view of Hebron (and
would never even bother to mention Jerusalem at all).

If we look at the Patriarchal narratives with fresh, unbiased eyes, we will
see that the Patriarchal narratives, unlike the rest of the Bible, were
composed by a northern Hebrew, not by one or more southern Hebrews.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois




**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489



  • [b-hebrew] The Role of Hebron: Jacob/"Israel", JimStinehart, 01/16/2008

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page