Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Ecclesiastes 3:11

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Bryant J. Williams III" <bjwvmw AT com-pair.net>
  • To: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>, "b-hebrew Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ecclesiastes 3:11
  • Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:42:18 -0800

Dear Yitzhak,

Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, 2nd Edited and Enlarged Edition by E. Kautzsch, from
the 26th German Edition. Fifteenth Impression, 1980.
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>
To: "b-hebrew Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ecclesiastes 3:11


> On Nov 17, 2007 8:01 PM, Bryant J. Williams III wrote:
> > Dear Yitzhak,
> >
> > Reference Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, page 483, Para. 152y, #2. It states
> > the
> > following:
>
> I am not sure what Gesenius you are quoting, but I think it would be
> nice to also
> reference the version that is online. The statement about the
> negatives is here:
>
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=genpub;idno=ahy1993.1853.001;seq=00000276
> That about ?$r is here:
>
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=genpub;idno=ahy1993.1853.001;seq=00000097
>
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=genpub;idno=ahy1993.1853.001;seq=00000234
>
> I think the entry in HALOT on ?$r is also good.
>
> On ?$r we can also refer to research that Holmstedt has publicized online:
> http://individual.utoronto.ca/holmstedt/HolmstedtHabakkuk.pdf
> http://individual.utoronto.ca/holmstedt/HolmstedtDissertation.pdf (393
> pages)
>
> I didn't read his dissertation yet. However, I doubt that his conclusions
> differ from what I suggested -- In normative Biblical Hebrew, ?$r
> always introduces
> a clause, and separates between complete clauses. "mbly" is not the
> end of a complete clause. It can't be divided this way. However, "mbly" is
> very similar to "without" and ?$r to "which", so that we could argue that
> the
> reading "without which" is justified if we adopt some non-normative syntax.
> But we still have to explain the non-normative syntax. Greek influence
> may provide the solution to this, but I don't know Greek to know if it would
> have provided such influence.
>
> Yitzhak Sapir
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
> For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a courtesy of
Com-Pair Services!
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1136 - Release Date: 11/17/07
> 2:55
PM
>
>


For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a courtesy of
Com-Pair Services!





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page