b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work
- From: "Markus Karzelek" <markus AT karzelek.com>
- To: "B-hebrew mailinglist" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:48:20 +0200
> 2. The first geographical reference in the Patriarchal
> narratives (Genesis 11: 28) is oddly to Ur.
> Ancient Ur was the only place on the face of the
> planet in mankind's long history that celebrated a multi-day New
> Year/Akitu celebration every 6 months. This peculiar early
> reference to Ur may signify that all ages in the Patriarchal
> narratives are being set forth in terms of 6-month "years".
I would be careful reading this out (or in) the reference to Ur, since the
Torah was written to the people of Israel - and not to readers in Ur.
And if - as you wrote - the residents of Ur have been the only one having an
6-month-year misunderstanding would have been inescapable.
Therefore I think we have to find other solutions than that one.
BTW: what are your sources about the 6-month-year. I'd like to read more
about this.
Markus
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
[b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work,
JimStinehart, 10/19/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work, Markus Karzelek, 10/21/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work,
JimStinehart, 10/21/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work, biblical hebrew, 10/22/2007
- [b-hebrew] Assumptions about ANE ages that just don't work, JimStinehart, 10/22/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.