Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] b-hebrew Digest, Vol 58, Issue 18

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
  • To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] b-hebrew Digest, Vol 58, Issue 18
  • Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:38:31 +0200

In the Bible, or at least most of it, everyone speaks good Hebrew. So do the Egyptians in Genesis and Exodus, the Midianites in Exodus and Judges, the Moabites in Judges, Arameans in Kings, all of the sailors and the people of Nineveh in Jonah and so on. This is just one more indication that the biblical authors did not intend to write word-for-word historical accounts of actual events - they had messages to get across, and wanted those messages to be as clear as possible to their intended audience - who of course spoke Hebrew. Only in those few places in which the foreigners' language was a part of the story did the writers make an effort to make them sound foreign.

As far as Yaakov's mention of the Ekron Inscription, Achish ben Padi's use of the title Sar rather than Melekh can be explained in three ways, none of them really satisfactory:

1. As Yaakov suggested, a throwback to what is presumably the old Philistine title Seren, used in the Bible for the rulers of the five major Philistine cities, and often thought to be connected to the Greek Tyranos. The problem with this is both the use of Sin and not Samekh, but more so the missing Nun.

2. Using Sar, which in Hebrew/Canaanite is a lower rank than Melekh (king), because the Philistines were subsurvient to the Assyrian Melekh (king). The problem with this is that the Assyrians themselves, in inscriptions by both Sennacherib and Essarhadon, had no problem with referring to both Padi and Achish (Ikaysu) by the title "king" (Sharru in Akkadian). So why would Achish feel obligated to use a lesser title?

3. The use of "Sar" is actually an adoption of the Akkadian "Sharru" used by the Assyrian overlords. Possible, but if so then unique.

Yigal Levin

----- Original Message ----- From: "Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s AT rad.com>
To: "Isaac Fried" <if AT math.bu.edu>
Cc: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] b-hebrew Digest, Vol 58, Issue 18


What is in interesting in the story of judges 14 is that the
Philistines appear to have spoken good Hebrew.

I don't know much about the language they spoke in the time of Samson
(12th century or so BCE?)
but in an 8th century BCE inscription found in Ekron
(published by Gitin, Dothan and Naveh)
the language is very close to Hebrew.

Interestingly the word &R is used for king instead of MLK,
which seems to be in line with the bible's usage of SRN
and &R (in Sam1).

Yaakov (J) Stein
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.13/1074 - Release Date: 16/10/2007 14:14







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page