Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] almighty?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Kevin W. Woodruff" <cierpke AT prodigy.net>
  • To: michaelabernat9001 AT sbcglobal.net, Biblical Hebrew List <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] almighty?
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:17:41 -0700 (PDT)

Michael:

In Genesis 17:1; 35:11 it is translated QEOS SOU (your God)

In Genesis 28:3; 43:14; 48:3 it is translated QEOS MOU (my God)

In Genesis 49:25 it is translated QEOS hO EMOS (my God)

In Exodus 6:3 it is translated as QEOS AUTWN (their God)

In Numbers 24:4,16 it is translated QEOS (God)

In Psalms 91:1 it is translated QEOS TOO OURANOU (God of Heaven)

In Ruth 1:20; Job 21:15; 31:2; 40:2 it is translated hO IKANOS or just
IKANOS (The Sufficient One)

In Job 5:17; 8:5; 11:7;15:25; 22:17, 25; 27:11; 32:8; 33:4 it is translated
PANTOKRATOR (Almighty)

In Job 6:4, 14;13:3; 21:20; 22:23,26; it is KURIOS. (Lord)

In Job 27:10 it is translated AUTOS (He)

In Job 8:3 it is hO TA PANTA POIESAS (He that made all things)

It is hO EPOURANIOS (The Heavenly One) in Psalm 67:15 (Psalm 68:14 in
English, Psalm 68:15 in Hebrew)

In Ezekiel 10:5, it is transliterated SADDAI

Codex Alexandrinus has IKANOS in Ezekiel 1:24

In Job 29:5, another text read in the LXX "When I was fruitful" instead of
the Hebrew "When Shaddai was yet with me"

In Job 31:35 another text in the LXX reads "if I had not feared the hand of
the Lord" instead of the Hebrew "Let Shaddai answer me"

In Job 37:23 another text in the LXX reads "we do not find another like his
strength" instead of the Hebrew "Shaddai, we cannot find him"

I hope this helps your query.


Prof. Kevin W. Woodruff, M.Div., M.S.I.S.
Library Director/Reference Librarian, Assistant Professor of Bible, Greek,
Theological Bibliography and Research
Tennessee Temple University/Temple Baptist Seminary, 1815 Union Ave.
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404, United States of America
423/493-4252 (office) 423/698-9447 (home) 423/493-4497 (FAX)
Cierpke AT prodigy.net http://pages.prodigy.net/cierpke/woodruff.htm



----- Original Message ----
From: "michaelabernat9001 AT sbcglobal.net" <michaelabernat9001 AT sbcglobal.net>
To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:03:28 PM
Subject: [b-hebrew] almighty?


To make a long story short, I was reading a commentary on Psalm 91 that
argued that שַׁדַּי $DY should be translated in such a way that it
demonstrates God's bounty. I was curious to see how it was translated in the
Septuagint so I looked it up. I was surprised to find that it was rarely
translated at all. Usually, the authors substituted God or Lord. Is there
some reason for this? Was שַׁדַּי considered too holy to translate or
something?
Sincerely,
Michael Abernathy
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>From Brak AT neo.rr.com Thu Jul 26 05:10:02 2007
Return-Path: <Brak AT neo.rr.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from ms-smtp-05.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-05.ohiordc.rr.com
[65.24.5.139])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29924C01B
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:10:02 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] (cpe-24-166-103-113.neo.res.rr.com
[24.166.103.113])
by ms-smtp-05.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id
l6Q99w7u013851; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:09:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <46A864E2.6060101 AT neo.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:09:54 -0500
From: Brak <Brak AT neo.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
References: <46A6D808.4070002 AT neo.rr.com>
<acd782170707251015g74a709d1s2ab54ed3b2a996dd AT mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <acd782170707251015g74a709d1s2ab54ed3b2a996dd AT mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Befuddled by NGD
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:10:03 -0000

So from what I get from all this is that the word NGD is like the word $M
Just as $M has two distict meanings dependent on how it is used ("there"
and "name") so does NGD

I now have another question regarding this word:

When it is first used in Genesis in the context of Eve I was always
taught that it meant "opposite" or "against".
I have never heard that it meant "in front of".
So could someone please explain how the idea of "in front of" fits in
that passage?

By the way, I appreciate all the input received thus far!

B"H
John Steven

"If you don't behave as you believe, you will end by believing as you
behave."
-Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen.


K Randolph wrote:

>John:
>
>I do not list "against" or "opposite" as possible meanings for NGD as
>those have connotations that go beyond the meaning of the Hebrew word
>(a translator may use those terms when he thinks it will make for a
>smoother English rendition, but a strict literal meaning is "before,
>in front of").
>
>The verbal meaning of NGD is "to be in front of, to be before" which
>in the hiphil with its causative becomes "to cause to be in front of"
>or in smoother English "to set before". That which is set before can
>be a person or object, but by far the most common things "caused to be
>in front of" are ideas, teachings, or other intangible (spoken)
>concepts. According to a concordance, it is used only in the
>causative, hiphil and hophal, in Tanakh.
>
>Karl W. Randolph.
>
>On 7/24/07, Brak <Brak AT neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I have a question.
>>
>>Sometimes NGD is translated as "against" or "opposite" or "in front", to
>>which I can see the relationship between.
>>But other times it's translated as "tell" or "declare".
>>
>>I don't see the common link between the idea of "opposite" and "telling".
>>Can someone please help me understand the relationship between these ideas.
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>B"H
>>John Steven
>>
>>"If you don't behave as you believe, you will end by believing as you
>>behave."
>>-Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen.
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>b-hebrew mailing list
>b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>
>



  • [b-hebrew] almighty?, michaelabernat9001, 07/25/2007
    • <Possible follow-up(s)>
    • Re: [b-hebrew] almighty?, Kevin W. Woodruff, 07/25/2007

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page