Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Dinah raped?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
  • To: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
  • Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Dinah raped?
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:10:18 -0400

Yigal,

Are you taking into consideration the possibility that at that time Dinah was 8-12 years old, and that she did not go out into foreign territories and alien households all by herself but had certainly at least one chaperon to accompany her?

Isaac Fried, Boston University

On Jul 21, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Yigal Levin wrote:

Very good points, James. But all this seems like very typical male behavior,
in traditional patriarchal societies - "boys will be boys, as long as they
don't do it with our sister". It was convenient for them to believe that
Dinah was raped, because then they did not have to deal with the possibly
that SHE had acted immorally. The text, as it would seem, is ambiguous,
maybe because the author, the descendants of Dinah's brothers, prefer not to
accuse their own ancestors of wanton genocide of a whole city. Their act,
however, is criticized by Jacob, both in v. 30 and later in his blessing in
49:5-7.



We find the same kind of behavior in chapter 38 - Judah has no problem with
going to a prostitute, but when he "finds out" that his daughter-in- law
Tamar had been a prostitute, he commands her burned. The text is critical of
his hypocrisy, but not of either one of his acts in themselves.



We must be very careful of assuming that the authors of the Bible shared the
same views on "morality" that modern-day Jews and Christians do. This is
especially true for matters of sexual behavior.



Yigal Levin


----- Original Message -----
From: "JAMES CHRISTIAN READ" <JCR128 AT student.anglia.ac.uk>

NWT Genesis 34:7
'And the sons of Jacob came in from the field as soon as they heard of it;
and the men became hurt in their feelings and they grew very angry,
because he had committed a disgraceful folly against Israel in lying down
with Jacob’s daughter, whereas nothing like that ought to be done.'

Note that no mention of force is included when
why her brothers were angry. It is the mere thought of
their unmarried sister having extra marital sex.

Further consider their response in verse 31 when being
reprised by Isreal for their actions:

“Ought anyone to treat our sister like a prostitute?”

What are prostitutes better known for in Tanakh?
For being forced to have sex?
Or for having immoral extra-marital sex?

However, one contextual point seems to stand in favour
of an element of force. And that is why does there
seem to be a complete lack of any indication of
responsibility on Dinah's shoulders? Why aren't her
brothers angry with her for acting 'like a prostitue'?
feelings and they grew very angry, because he had committed a disgraceful
folly against Israel in lying down with Jacob’s daughter, whereas nothing
like that ought to be done.'

Note that no mention of force is included when
why her brothers were angry. It is the mere thought of
their unmarried sister having extra marital sex.

Further consider their response in verse 31 when being
reprised by Isreal for their actions:

“Ought anyone to treat our sister like a prostitute?”

What are prostitutes better k

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page