b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Staffan Bengtsson <staffan.bengtsson AT sh.se>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Genesis 1, 6-7
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:38:34 +0200
I am a Swedish scholar (comparative literature) and have come accross a swedish translation from 18th century which does not translate/ interpret the separation between water and water of the second day in the usual way, but also adds "so that the waters may be shifted with each other", i.e. an exchange between the two waters is emphasized. 1. Has anyone come accross any similar translation/interpretation? 2. Can anyone see a way to support this translation from the Hebrew? SB
From peter AT qaya.org Sun Mar 25 17:05:26 2007Return-Path: <peter AT qaya.org>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mail.bcisgnet.co.uk (mail.bcisgnet.co.uk [212.100.232.232])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E644C010
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:05:26 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from mail.bcisgnet.co.uk (mail.bcisgnet.co.uk [212.100.232.232])
by mail.bcisgnet.co.uk with ESMTP id l2PL5Kfj010092
(SMTP Authenticated by TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) ;
Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:05:21 +0100
Message-ID: <4606E416.9040403 AT qaya.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:05:26 +0100
From: Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
References: <mailman.10.1174752003.8396.b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
<46059725.2030906 AT hotmail.com>
<acd782170703241715h16efc5b5lce55c499c676564e AT mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <acd782170703241715h16efc5b5lce55c499c676564e AT mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Scanned by ClamAV (http://www.clamav.net/
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 212.100.232.232
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Hithpael functions (was Question for Rolf on the JW
outlook on the Hebrew)
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:05:26 -0000
On 25/03/2007 00:15, K Randolph wrote:
...
Thanks for the little article. I have not read it all, but the author,
even as far as I have read, I find I disagree with him. It doesn't
help that his second example is marred by combining two different
words that have become homonyms in English (also in German, but not in
Norwegian), trying to say that they are examples of multiple uses of
the same word. ...
Karl, it is interesting to see that you are finding fault with a study which takes two homonyms to be the same word because it has not made proper use of evidence from cognate languages that these are originally distinct homonyms. (I have not read the article, so I don't know what word is being referred to.) You seem happy to apply this principle to English, based on your knowledge of Norwegian which most others on this list do not share. Why do you object when other people apply the same principle to Hebrew, based on their knowledge of other Semitic languages which you do not know?
--
Peter Kirk
E-mail: peter AT qaya.org
Blog: http://www.qaya.org/blog/
Website: http://www.qaya.org/
- [b-hebrew] Genesis 1, 6-7, Staffan Bengtsson, 03/25/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.