Biblical Hebrew Forum

["K Randolph" <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>]

Peter:

This is what the dictionaries I consulted also mentioned. But the
words do have meaning, and that meaning fits the context.

To give an example from some of American fundamentalism: no smoking,
no movies, girls must wear skits to 4 inches below the knee, no make
up, rule after rule after rule. What happened to the Gospel, you might
ask? It was swallowed up by rules.

Some branches of Orthodox Judaism have done the same: whereas there
were 613 laws in all of Torah, there are 1500 for the Sabbath alone in
Talmud, and so forth.

I think Paul was citing a different passage in prophecy, and I vaguely
remember that such a passage may exist, but I don't remember where.

Karl W. Randolph.

On 12/29/06, Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org> wrote:
> On 29/12/2006 20:22, K Randolph wrote:
> > ...
> >> Isaiah 28:10 and 28:13 have cw lcw followed by qw lqw.
> >>
> >
> > Again distinct meanings, CW from the same root as MCWH commandment,
> > means a command. QW is a (measuring) line, often used to make a QWH
> > measurement. Again, this is poetic with similar sounding yet
> > complimentary meanings, saying that the" word of God has become to
> > them a command to a command, a command to a command, a measuring line
> > to a measuring line, a measuring line to a measuring line, a little
> > here, a little there" in other words, concentrating on picayune rules
> > and regulations, how far one can walk a sabbath, etc.
> >
> >
> I would suggest that these words are actually deliberately meaningless,
> an imitation of foreign words which the hearers will not understand, as
> suggested by verse 11, and the last part of verse 13, cf. 6:9,10.
> Compare also how Paul uses verses 11-12 in 1 Corinthians 14:21,23 to
> refer to incomprehensible "tongues".
>
> --
> Peter Kirk
> E-mail:  peter AT qaya.org
> Blog:    http://speakertruth.blogspot.com/
> Website: http://www.qaya.org/