b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie
- From: Shoshanna Walker <rosewalk AT concentric.net>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:10:35 -0500
On this verse, Ramban writes:
"At the time you eat of it, you will be condemned to die. (similar to I Kings 2:42 - this does not mean that Shimi is to die immediately on that day; nor does it refer to his mere knowledge thereof, namely that he is to know that he will die eventually.....But it does mean that at the time he - Shimi - goes forth from Jerusalem, he is liable to death at the hand of the king, and he will slay him when he pleases. Similar to Numbers 4:20 and Leviticus 22:9 - Their intent is not that those who transgress against these prohibitions will die immediately, but only that they will be liable to death and die on account of this sin of theirs)
On his immortality, Ramban continues:
"Now in the opinion of men versed in the sciences of nature, man was destined to die from the beginning of his formation, on account of his being a composite [of the four elements, and everything that is composite must revert to its original components]. But now He decreed that if he will sin he will die on account of his sin, like those who are liable to death at the hands of Heaven for such sins as a non-priest eating the Heave-offering, or a priest who has drunk wine or who does not wear the [required number of priestly] garments when performing the Service in the Sanctuary, and other cases. There the intent is that they will die PREMATURELY on account of their sin. This is why in stating the punishment [after Adam ate of the fruit of the tree of knowledge] He said, "Till thou return to the gournd, for out of it wast thou taken, for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return (Genesis 3:19), by your nature. In the beginning, before he sinned, Adam also ate of the fruit of the tree and of the seeds of the earth; and if so, there was bou nd to be depletion in his body, and he was subject to the cause of existence and destruction; thus the opinion of the men of science.
But in the opinion of our Rabbis (Talmud Shabbat 58b), if Adam had not sinned he would have never died, since the higher soul bestows life forever, and the Will of G-d which is in him at the time of his formation would always cleave to him and he would exist forever, as I have explained in the verse, "And G-d saw that it was good"
"And G-d saw that it was good" (Genesis 1:10) This means that their continued existence was by His Will, and the purpose is that when He clothed them with this form He desired them to be so and their existence was thus established as I have explained (in verse 4). This conforms to what our Rabbis have said (Bereshit Rabba 4:8).
end of Ramban
Oral Torah (Kabbala) teaches that Adam was created with enormous spiritual stature, that spanned from one end of the universe to the other, and that his soul originally contained ALL the souls of everyone that were to exist for eternity (Arizal in Shaar HaGilgulim).
Shoshanna
We touched on this just recently. The text merely state "in (the) day"
without specifying any particular day, not even "this" day, which is
often used to specify a period of time, not a particular day.
So it can be understood that Adam started dying the day he ate the
fruit, but it took 930 years before he was laid in the grave.
As for the targum, I'll let others discuss that.
Karl W. Randolph.
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
Shoshanna Walker, 12/01/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie, Shoshanna Walker, 12/02/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
George Athas, 12/03/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
Isaac Fried, 12/03/2006
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
Isaac Fried, 12/05/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie, davidfentonism, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
Isaac Fried, 12/05/2006
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Message not available
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
K Randolph, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
Arthur Gershman, 12/05/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17, YODAN, 12/05/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie, Peter Kirk, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
Arthur Gershman, 12/05/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie,
Isaac Fried, 12/03/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] Gen. 2:16-17 :: idiom or clumsy lie, davidfentonism, 12/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.