Biblical Hebrew Forum

[kgraham0938 AT comcast.net]

H.A.L.O.T says on pg 516 that L"BBAV is semantically the same as L"B; sg. 
also used of more than one Ex 14:5, Dt 20:8b, Jr 4:4 particular usages, to 
beat the breast Nah 2:8, 1 C 22:7...
--
Kelton Graham 
KGRAHAM0938 AT comcast.net

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Chris and Nel" <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net> 

> Just a quick question because it is impossible to search for this in 
> Gesenius. So your help is appreciated. 
> 
> It seems that the difference between the use of 'LeV' and 'Le'VaV (say for 
> example between Proverbs 4:21 and Proverbs 3:3) is that the Latter (Le'VaV) 
> implies a more FORMAL EMPHASIS when the writer refers to the heart in its 
> metaphorical sense? - am I wrong because this info was gleaned from a 
> modern 
> hebrew definition. 
> 
> Thankyou 
> Chris Watts 
> Ireland 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> b-hebrew mailing list 
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew 
>From Revdpickrel AT wmconnect.com  Sat Jul 15 21:12:07 2006
Return-Path: <Revdpickrel AT wmconnect.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com (imo-m25.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.6])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5A84C00B
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:12:07 -0400 
(EDT)
Received: from Revdpickrel AT wmconnect.com
        by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id o.562.203b6dc (39330);
        Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:12:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Revdpickrel AT wmconnect.com
Message-ID: <562.203b6dc.31eaec62 AT wmconnect.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:12:02 EDT
To: kwrandolph AT gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501
X-Spam-Flag: NO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.8
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Genesis 2:4
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 01:12:07 -0000

In a message dated 7/15/2006 3:08:24 PM Central Daylight Time, 
kwrandolph AT gmail.com writes:


> Actually, I am suspicious of all eisegesis, but Genesis is especially
> prone to eisegesis. There are a lot of places where Genesis makes
> implications, even strong implications, but does not provide details.
> That Qain was afraid of other people is an example of just such an
> implication, understandable only if there were many other people to be
> afraid of.
> 
> It is eisegesis to try to fill in the details that are implied, and it
> is so very tempting.
> 
> Karl W. Randolph.

Actually, you're correct here, and I guess I am most guilty of doing this.  
Although I compare passages before coming to a conclusion.  

It is Robert W. Faid, author of the series, "A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO 
BIBLICAL MYSTERIES" that makes the colophan distinction: Genesis 5:4 begins 
with Seth 
and the rest about his generation.  Robert Faid is a nuclear scientist and 
consultant to the nuclear power industry.  He's much like you, he dabs in 
mathematics, history, archaeology, linguistics, and theology.  In his book he 
states 
there are at least twelve such indication of joint authorship in Genesis.  He 
is very persuasive giving his evidence.

Doug.
Rev. Doug Pickrel, Litt.D.
Tejas Valley
San Antonio, Texas