Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew - dialect of canaanite

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Yigal Levin <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
  • To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew - dialect of canaanite
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:11:27 +0200

Dear Chris,

Besides all of Yitzhak's perfectly correct comments bellow, what all this means is that the demographic majority of the people who eventually became "Israelites" and wrote the Hebrew Bible were of Canaanite origin. There are other reasons to assume this as well. This does not mean a priori that there was no Exodus and no Abraham - but it does mean that the biblical accounts of these events cannot be take at face value.

Prof. Anson Rainey, by the way, has developed a threory according to which BH is actually a "transjordanian" dialect (more akin to Moabite than to Pheonician), but I have yet to read all of the evidence.

Yigal


----- Original Message ----- From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Hebrew - dialect of canaanite


On 6/27/06, Chris and Nel wrote:

Hallo,

If the Lingua Franca of the Israelites at the time of entering Canaan circa
1400 BC(1250 BC for some), is classed, by linguists and biblical scholars,
as a dialect of Canaanite, how can I understand this in terms of:

Scholars do not know or classify the "lingua franca of the Israelites
at the time
of entering Canaan circa 1400 BC (1250 BC)" for several reasons:
1) It is not clear at all if the Israelites entered Canaan at 1400 BC or 1250 BC
or were just there to begin with or whether "Israelites" was not a phenomenon
that developed much later.
2) In any case, there is no evidence from this time of the language of the
Israelites.
3) The Hebrew of the Bible is classified as a Northwest Semitic (NWS)
language, a development of Canaanite. Canaanite and NWS are known from
various inscriptions include Amarna letters, Ugaritic tablets, Alalah tablets,
and Taanakh tablets. In any case, from a linguistic point of view it represents
a later stage than the attested languages of those dates.
4) Hebrew and Aramaic differ markedly. Babylonian Aramaic did not exist
until much later, however. Aramaic is only known from about the 9th century
onwards, as are various later Canaanite dialects (Moabite, Israelite, Judaean,
Phoenician).
5) In the late 2nd millenium BCE, the "lingua franca" was Akkadian, another
Semitic branch. It was used by Canaanite city state rulers to address the
Egyptian rulers of the time, even though the rulers' native tongue was
Canaanite, and the Egyptians' was Egyptian.

Yitzhak Sapir
http://toldot.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page