Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Fwd: Re: CV syllables, was music in Hebrew

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rochelle Altman <willaa AT netvision.net.il>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Fwd: Re: CV syllables, was music in Hebrew
  • Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:15:58 +0200


Dear Herman,

Dear Rochelle,
I understand what you mean, but I meant that some people like to count
the syllables not as the Masoretes heard them but as they were
supposedly "originally intended".

The first error they make is to treat songs as poetry; songs are not poems. This is true also of hymns from Kish, Akkad, and Ugarit. These are all songs that have been examined as if they were poetry. They are not; there is an important distinction here. Songs are to be sung; poems are to be recited. It's not the same thing at all. Compare, say, 1Sam 15:32, which is a charm chant sung by Samuel, with 2Sam 19-27, which is a poem in blank verse, with 2Sam 22:2-51, which is a song -- the latter two Davidic.

(The Davidic songs and poems [including his Psalms] are multivocal to an extent that we do not see again until Shakespeare. Great masters are long and far between -- that's why they are remembered. Davidic works are identifiable by intense multivocalic word play, sound play, sophisticated external and internal structures, and internal cross-linkages. Wheeler claims the marker is lyricism; that, too, but it's not a primary marker.)

The second error is to count syllables in the songs -- and they also try to force the Biblical songs into a 4/4 metrical scan. That's been going on since the 19th-century.

I have a congenital aversion to being lumped with these folks even by implication. I work with ancient music.

The fact that for the masora a word
like melekh has two syllables doesn't mean that the older 'ancestor'
word *malk had two syllables too.

I can check this against the bilingual, if you would like me to. Or, if you'd rather, I can check and see if there's a short article on just this point worth writing up..

For example, Jan Fokkelman, of whom I attended quite a few lectures in
the past in Holland, likes to handle biblical poetry that make. I'm
not sure if it's really my cup of tea, but sure he doesn't follow the
directions of the masora.

I said MS, not edition of the MT. I start with the bilingual -- the MS that contains the full instructions on *how* to sing the psalm -- including psalm tone, psalm formula, precentor solos, and congregational responses: THEN I check the MT against the bilingual. Where possible, I check against the DSS texts. Now that photographs of the Aleppo are available on-line; I am checking against it, as well.

One thing I have found, which should make people happy, is that the vast majority of philological and linguistic theories are supported by the bilingual and other texts What is often brought into question is the dating of when xyz happened. On the Old English side, some changes that are postulated to have been pre-historic are documented as happening during the historic period. For Hebrew, changes that theoretically occurred late, seem to have happened earlier. Not all, by any means, but enough in both cases.

Overall, the concrete evidence written into the documents supports the theories. The one major problem is that this supporting evidence can only be seen in originals, not in standardized editions. On the Hebrew side, Torah scrolls still retain an incredible amount of ancillary information, even written in square script with nikud and ta'amim. Most of the nikud are unnecessary -- the information is already there...

Never get me started on this material; I tend to run on. Sorry.

Regards,

Regards
×
2006/2/2, Rochelle Altman <willaa AT netvision.net.il>:
> At 11:32 PM 2/1/2006, Herman Meester wrote:
>
> >[snip]
>
> >As there are so many segolates, this is something
> >important for those who like to count syllables in the psalms.
>
> "Like to count syllables in the psalms"??? You have it backwards. The fact
> that Adonai is assigned three notes makes it three syllables. Not the other
> way around.
>
> There is a very big differences between counting syllables and the melodic
> structure of ancient music: one note-one syllable, all notes of equal
> length. Simple, really.
>
> Even simpler, just follow the directions written into the MSS.
>
> >Herman
>
> Rochelle




  • [b-hebrew] Fwd: Re: CV syllables, was music in Hebrew, Rochelle Altman, 02/03/2006

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page