Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>]

On 31/07/2005 19:37, kgraham0938 AT comcast.net wrote:

> ...
>
> That really does not make sense to me.  How can concubines women have the flesh of 
> a donkey?  That is why I think that PILAG:$"HEM should be translated as 
> genitials or something related to it.
>
>  
Well, women do have large fleshy parts which men lust after. Could the 
reference here be to those parts?

And to the objection that the lusting one is female, I would say that 
the female word is being used allegorically of males.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 28/07/2005