Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Kings 18:16 - Pillars??

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
  • To: Karl Randolph <kwrandolph AT email.com>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Kings 18:16 - Pillars??
  • Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:55:12 -0800 (PST)

Absolutely correct in principle, Karl.
(Except if one is a commentator or a translator)

Uri

Karl Randolph <kwrandolph AT email.com> wrote:
.

I don’t see the problem in admitting that we don’t know what it means.

Karl W. Randolph.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kirk"


>
>...
>
> This is the crucial evidence which shows that "shields" does make
> sense in the context. (Note that I am not supporting the textual
> emendation, but suggesting a different meaning for the extant
> Hebrew text.) Rehoboam was forced to pay off Shishak with golden
> shields. Hezekiah was forced to pay off Sennacherib with golden
> 'OMNOT. The parallel is so close that it is almost compelling, in
> my opinion.
>
> -- Peter Kirk
> peter AT qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
> http://www.qaya.org/
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun.
>From peterkirk AT qaya.org Fri Apr 1 05:21:31 2005
Return-Path: <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from pan.hu-pan.com (hu-pan.com [67.15.6.3])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13F64C005
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:21:25 -0500
(EST)
Received: from 213-162-124-237.peterk253.adsl.metronet.co.uk
([213.162.124.237] helo=[10.0.0.1])
by pan.hu-pan.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.50)
id 1DHJHI-0004Kl-Ac; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:21:24 +0100
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.308 [266.9.0]);
Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:21:23 +0100
Message-ID: <424D20A3.1060204 AT qaya.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:21:23 +0100
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us, az, ru, tr, he, el, fr, de
To: "John W. Leys" <eliyahu5733 AT jerusalem.zzn.com>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] God vs angels in Ps 8:5
References: <20050331235511.64734.qmail AT web50105.mail.yahoo.com>
<424C9566.7070106 AT jerusalem.zzn.com>
In-Reply-To: <424C9566.7070106 AT jerusalem.zzn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pan.hu-pan.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.ibiblio.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - qaya.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:21:31 -0000

On 01/04/2005 01:27, John W. Leys wrote:

> ... What appears in the NT (as well in Rabbinic literature) are
> theological interpretations of the text written by people who were
> also not native speakers of Biblical Hebrew.
>
This last part is contentious. Many would argue that the NT authors were
more likely native speakers of Aramaic, but they would very likely have
been well acquainted with Hebrew from childhood at least at the
synagogue. The everyday Hebrew of the time was not precisely Biblical,
but it was a lot closer to Biblical Hebrew than is the modern language.
So there is a good chance that they understood the obscure parts of the
Hebrew Bible a lot better than anyone does today.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 31/03/2005





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page