b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Dora Smith" <villandra AT austin.rr.com>
- To: "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk AT qaya.org>, "Uri Hurwitz" <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
- Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:08:39 -0600
This appears to be an interesting question.
A liberal analysis argued that ish or 'iysh is used to mean both man and
woman, as in laws forbidding murder and that sort of thing.
That is what it would mean now - but, for instance, the Deuteronomic law
code treated women as chattal capable only of being stolen or used without
permission. Not people with minds and will to do wrong. DID laws that
used the term 'iysh' include both men and women by that term?
Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, Texas
villandra AT austin.rr.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
To: "Uri Hurwitz" <uhurwitz AT yahoo.com>
Cc: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar
> On 28/02/2005 16:47, Uri Hurwitz wrote:
>
> > Well, does the English word "man" refer to the masculine gender,
> > as one would think, or really to both masculine and feminie? ...
>
>
> In my dialect and that of most British speakers today, to the masculine
> only. But I take your point that in many languages there is a tendency
> for words for "man" etc to shift between male-only and gender generic
> reference.
>
> > ... The term "mankind" or the expression "everyman" does refer
> > genrally to both sexes. ...
>
>
> Perhaps, but these words are obsolescent, not least because they are
> offensive to 50% of the population.
>
> > ... Which raises a question about your examples: what conclusions
> > about a rule can one derive from the exceptions?
> >
>
> Good question. But Yigal wrote ""Ish" means "man" - an adult male ... It
> never means "man and woman"." Well, it takes only one exception to
> overturn a "never". Anyway, the "exceptions" I quoted are by no means
> unique, it is regular usage for 'ish, especially repeated as 'ish 'ish,
> to mean "each" in a gender neutral way.
>
> --
> Peter Kirk
> peter AT qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
> http://www.qaya.org/
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.1 - Release Date: 27/02/2005
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
Re: [b-hebrew] What was it with the dogs? Cult objects or male prostitutes?
, (continued)
-
Re: [b-hebrew] What was it with the dogs? Cult objects or male prostitutes?,
Heard, Christopher, 02/17/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] What was it with the dogs? Cult objects or maleprostitutes?, Dora Smith, 02/18/2005
-
[b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar,
Dora Smith, 02/27/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar,
Yigal Levin, 02/28/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar, Yigal Levin, 02/28/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar,
Peter Kirk, 02/28/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar,
Uri Hurwitz, 02/28/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar,
Peter Kirk, 02/28/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar, Uri Hurwitz, 02/28/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar, C. Stirling Bartholomew, 02/28/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar, Dora Smith, 02/28/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar, Peter Kirk, 02/28/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar,
Peter Kirk, 02/28/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar,
Uri Hurwitz, 02/28/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar, C. Stirling Bartholomew, 02/28/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 'iysh and zakar,
Yigal Levin, 02/28/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] What was it with the dogs? Cult objects or male prostitutes?,
Heard, Christopher, 02/17/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.