b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?
- From: "Vadim Cherny" <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
- To: "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:16:38 +0200
Dear
Best regards,
Serge
Export manager
Unikom-Ug Corp.
5 Shuhevicha St. Odessa 65011 Ukraine
tel. 380 482 210672 fax 380 482 210411
unikom_ug AT hotmail.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
To: "Vadim Cherny" <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
Cc: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?
> On 10/02/2005 12:36, Peter Kirk wrote:
>
> > ...
> >
> > According to Terence Wade's "A Comprehensive Russian Grammar", the
> > following vowel sounds are heard in Russian (in IPA, you need Unicode
> > to read some of these):
> >
> > Stressed: a ɛ u o ɨ i e æ ö ü
> > Unstressed (additional): ɩ ɩ̵ ʌ ə
> >
> I failed to complete this part of my posting before sending it. Here is
> a continuation:
>
> This list indicated that modern phoneticians hear more distinct vowel
> sounds in modern spoken Russian (as well as English and many other
> modern languages) than the Masoretes heard in Hebrew.
>
> Wade notes (p.5, 2nd edition of Wade):
>
> The vowels o and a arepronounced as [o] and [a] only when they appear in
> stressed position...
>
> In pre-tonic position or as the unstressed initial letter in a word o
> and a are pronounced [ʌ] ...
>
> In pre-pre-tonic position (except as initial letters...) or in
> post-tonic position both vowels are pronounced [ə]...
>
> This is very like the position in Hebrew. The full vowel sound e.g.
> qamats or holam is found only in stressed syllables, plus in Hebrew only
> in open unstressed syllables. In unstressed syllables just before the
> stress (in Hebrew, only when closed) the vowel is shortened e.g. to
> patah or qamats qatan. And in pre-pre-tonic position (but this time in
> Hebrew only in open syllables) there is a further shortening or
> modification to the schwa sound - but not word initially after alef. The
> details are nt identical, but the general picture is remarkably similar.
> It is also in English, because these kinds of vowel reductions are
> common across languages.
>
> What is unusual about the Masoretes is that they attempted to record
> fine phonetic distinctions which had no semantic significance, whereas
> most modern Latin and Cyrillic alphabets are more phonemic i.e. not
> recording these fine distinctions.
>
> --
> Peter Kirk
> peter AT qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
> http://www.qaya.org/
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 07/02/2005
>
>
-
[b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Vadim Cherny, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Peter Kirk, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Vadim Cherny, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Peter Kirk, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Vadim Cherny, 02/10/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Peter Kirk, 02/10/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Peter Kirk, 02/10/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Vadim Cherny, 02/10/2005
-
Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Vadim Cherny, 02/10/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Peter Kirk, 02/10/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Vadim Cherny, 02/11/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Peter Kirk, 02/11/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Vadim Cherny, 02/11/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Peter Kirk, 02/11/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Vadim Cherny, 02/11/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Peter Kirk, 02/11/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Vadim Cherny, 02/13/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?, Peter Kirk, 02/14/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Peter Kirk, 02/10/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Peter Kirk, 02/10/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Vadim Cherny, 02/10/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Peter Kirk, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Vadim Cherny, 02/09/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why assume the Masoretes recorded spoken Hebrew?,
Peter Kirk, 02/09/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.